Policy Analysis of the Development of Iran’s Cinema Industry: A Thematic Analysis Approach

Authors

    Ali Ganjalikhani Farsangi Department of Media Manaegment, Se.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
    Ehtesham Rashidi * Department of Management, Se.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran e.rashidi@iau.ac.ir
    Ali Faez Department of Management, Se.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

Keywords:

policy, development, industry, cinema

Abstract

One of the distinctive domains within cultural industries and the cultural economy is cinema, which holds substantial importance from cultural, social, and economic perspectives. On the one hand, the cinema industry is among the principal instruments of culture-building in society. By creating specific conditions for audiences and instilling particular ideas, the cinematic space plays a fundamental role in shaping and transforming societal attitudes. One of the primary pathways to achieving development is the adoption and implementation of appropriate and timely policymaking. Accordingly, the aim of the present study is to analyze the policymaking processes related to the development of Iran’s cinema industry. In terms of purpose, the study is applied; in terms of data, it is qualitative; and in terms of analytical method, it employs thematic analysis. The statistical sample consisted of 10 experts from the cinema industry. The sampling method was non-random purposive sampling. Based on the analysis of documented policies—including approvals, bylaws, and regulations—as well as the programs of Ministers of Culture and Islamic Guidance across different periods, in addition to interview analyses, 20 categories for the development of Iran’s cinema industry were identified. The findings indicate that the policies and strategies governing Iran’s cinema economy have been influenced by the political discourses of each period and government. Even with changes in individuals and relevant officials within a single government, shifts can be observed in policies and strategies and, consequently, in actions and outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Throsby D. The Economics of Cultural Policy. Alaei S, editor. Tehran: Sureh Mehr; 2014.

2. Hansen, Bille T. Cultural Economics and Cultural Policy: A Discussion in Danish Context. the European Journal of cultural policy. 2023;2:87-103. doi: 10.1080/10286639509358003.

3. Chisholm DC, Fernandez-Blanco V, Ravid SA, Walls WD. Economics of motion pictures: the state of the art. Journal of Cultural Economics. 2020;39:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10824-014-9234-1.

4. Scott AJ. French Cinema Economy, Policy and Place in the Making of a Cultural-Products Industry. theory culture and society. 2019;17:1-38. doi: 10.1177/02632760022050988.

5. Hansen HF. Choosing Evaluation Models: A Discussion on Evaluation Design. Evaluation. 2015;11(4):447-62. doi: 10.1177/1356389005060265.

6. Calin R, editor Economic indicators in the evaluation of public policies for the cinema: the wrong road. 10th international conference in interpretive policy analysis; 2015 2021-07-08/2021-07-10; Lille.

7. Hill J, Kawashima N. introduction: film policy in globalized cultural economy. international journal of cultural policy. 2020;22(5):667-72. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2016.1223649.

8. Parc J. The effects of protection in cultural industries: the case of the Korean film policies. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2020.

9. Gomez R, Munoz Larroa A. Cultural Industries and Policy in Mexico and Canada after 20 years of NAFTA. Nomrteaerica. 2021;9(2):173-95. doi: 10.20999/nam.2014.b007.

10. Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM. Advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In: Weible CM, editor. Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2018. p. 184-223.

11. Hawlett M, Ramesh M. Policy subsystem configurations and policy change: operationalizing the post positivist analysis of the politics of the policy process. Policy studies journal. 2022;26(3):466-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01913.x.

12. Béland D. Reconsidering policy feedback: How policies affect politics. Administration & Society. 2021;42(5):568-90. doi: 10.1177/0095399710377444.

13. Ganji M, Amin H. Cultural Capital and the Economics of Culture (Emphasizing the Theories of Pierre Bourdieu and David Throsby). Rahbord Quarterly. 2022;23(72):77-97.

14. Nazemi Ardakani M, Sayyadi M. Examining the Status of Cultural Components in Iran's Economy, A Comparative Study with Selected Countries and Proposing Solutions to Improve the State of the Cultural Economy in the Country. Social Cultural Strategy Quarterly. 2021;3(13):191-225.

15. Ravadrad A, Tamannaee A. Analyzing the Relationship Between Iran's Cultural-Cinematic Policies and Films Introduced as Representatives of Iranian Cinema to the Academy Awards. Cultural Research Quarterly. 2020:81-103.

16. Gerow A. Recent Film Policy and the Fate of Film Criticism in Japan. 2023.

17. Karimi M. Investigation and Identification of Factors Affecting the Cinema Economy in Iran Using the Econometric Approach of Dynamic Systems. Deputy of Technology Development and Cinematic Studies, 2022.

18. Elmi Moghaddam M. Presenting a Framework for the Economic Analysis of Iranian Cinema [Unpublished master's thesis]. Islamic Knowledge and Economics: Imam Sadegh University; 2020.

19. Nassiri H. Holding Onto Power: The Film Industry’s Stratification in the Digital Age. JCMS Journal of Cinema and Media Studies. 2023;63(5):51-76. doi: 10.1353/cj.2023.a918257.

20. Sasanpour E, Edrisi ATM. Representation of Women's Social Movements in Cinema Films (Suffragette, North Country, Iron Jawed Angels, The Rosa Parks Story) from the Decades (1920-2016) Using Charles Sanders Peirce's Semiotics Method. Social-Cultural Changes. 2024;21(1).

21. Thinh MP. Personal Freedom and Societal Expectations Towards LGBTQ+: Audience Insights Into Vietnamese Cinema's “Goodbye Mother”. Sexuality Gender & Policy. 2024;7(1):43-64. doi: 10.1002/sgp2.12085.

22. Portney PR. Public policies for environmental protection: Routledge; 2019.

23. Gholipour R, Alvani SM, Zarei Matin H, Jandaghi G, Hamidzadeh A. Designing a Model of Factors Affecting the Use of Policy Research in Policymaking; Using Conceptual Mapping. Majlis & Rahbord Quarterly. 2012;19(70).

24. Akreman J, Gudmundsson H, Sørensen CH, Isaksson K, Olsen S, Kessler F, et al. How to manage barriers to formation and implementation of policy packages in transport. Optic. Optimal policies for Transport in Combination, 2019.

25. Xu X, Tong W, Wei Z, Xia M. Transforming cinematography lighting education in the metaverse. Visual Informatics. 2025;9(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.visinf.2024.11.003.

26. Coate B, Verhoeven D, Davidson A. The Cinema Cities Index: comparing urban cinema culture around the world. Media International Australia. 2022;163(1):163-75. doi: 10.1177/1329878X17693931.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-10

Submitted

2024-11-18

Revised

2025-02-11

Accepted

2025-02-18

How to Cite

Ganjalikhani Farsangi, A. ., Rashidi, E., & Faez, A. . (2025). Policy Analysis of the Development of Iran’s Cinema Industry: A Thematic Analysis Approach. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 3(2), 1-13. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/121

Similar Articles

51-60 of 64

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.