Designing a Process Model of Intelligent Assessment Centers for the Establishment of a Meritocracy System in Government Organizations
Keywords:
Intelligent Assessment Centers, Meritocracy, Government Organizations, Human Resource Management, Competency AssessmentAbstract
The present study aimed to design a process model of intelligent assessment centers for the establishment and strengthening of a meritocracy system in government organizations. This study was conducted using a qualitative approach with an applied-developmental orientation and an exploratory purpose. The methodological strategy was thematic analysis, which was employed to identify and conceptualize the dimensions and components of intelligent assessment centers in the public sector. The research participants consisted of 15 experts in the fields of human resource management, assessment centers, digital transformation, artificial intelligence applications, and public administration. Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling techniques based on their professional expertise and practical experience. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using a systematic thematic analysis process involving coding, categorization, theme development, and model construction. To enhance the rigor and trustworthiness of the findings, credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability procedures were employed throughout the research process. The findings resulted in the development of a comprehensive process model consisting of four overarching dimensions: input, process, output, and consequence. The input dimension included legal frameworks and administrative requirements, smart competency orientation, digital maturity and organizational readiness, and intelligent technologies and infrastructures. The process dimension comprised digital assessment process design, smart assessment methods and tools, data management and decision-support analytics, and validity, reliability, and ethical governance of assessment. The output dimension encompassed competency assessment results and analytical decision-support reports. The consequence dimension included feedback, development and continuous improvement of human capital, enhancement of human resource decision quality, promotion of meritocracy, reduction of subjectivity, increased organizational justice, and improvement of human resource governance quality. Overall, the model demonstrated that intelligent assessment centers function as integrated socio-technical systems that combine competency-based assessment, digital technologies, data-driven analytics, and governance mechanisms to support transparent, objective, and merit-based personnel decisions. The proposed model provides a comprehensive framework for implementing intelligent assessment centers in government organizations and offers a practical pathway for strengthening meritocracy through competency-based evaluation, algorithm-supported decision-making, transparent assessment procedures, and continuous human capital development. The integration of technological, organizational, ethical, and governance dimensions enables public organizations to improve the quality, fairness, accountability, and effectiveness of recruitment, promotion, appointment, and talent development processes.
Downloads
References
1. Jbara SEB, David P, Alpan G, editors. A Modeling Framework Based on SCOR Model towards Supply Chain Risk Management. 45th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering CIE45; 2015.
2. Liang D, Bhamra R, Liu Z, Pan Y. Risk Propagation and Supply Chain Health Control Based on the SIR Epidemic Model. Mathematics. 2022;10(16):3008. doi: 10.3390/math10163008.
3. Duong ATB, Vo VX, do Sameiro Carvalho M, Sampaio P, Truong HQ. Risks and Supply Chain Performance: Globalization and COVID-19 Perspectives. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2023;72(7):1962-86. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2021-0179.
4. Gholami-Zanjani SM, Klibi W, Jabalameli MS, Pishvaee MS. The Design of Resilient Food Supply Chain Networks Prone to Epidemic Disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2021;233:108001. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108001.
5. Zarei M, Ghasemi A. Correlation-aware risk assessment in Iran's automotive supply chains under sanctions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2025;259:109982. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109982.
6. Arshadi, Azizi, Mohajeri. A Model for Evaluating and Ranking Automotive Parts Supply Chain Risks Using Fuzzy Cognitive Map and Interpretive Structural Modeling. Industrial Management Studies. 2022;20(67):121-58.
7. Chari A, Marti S, Johansson B, Despeisse M, Stahre J, Lopes PV, editors. Modeling Risk Prioritization of a Manufacturing Supply Chain Using Discrete Event Simulation. 2023 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC); 2023: IEEE.
8. Cook WG. Multi-Factor Modeling as an Enabler of Supply Chain Risk Management. Muma Business Review. 2023;7:121-32. doi: 10.28945/5198.
9. Gao D. A Big Data-Driven Knowledge Framework for Supply Chain Risk Prediction and Performance Optimization in Multinational Corporations. International Journal of Knowledge Management. 2026;22(1):1-25. doi: 10.4018/ijkm.402393.
10. Zogaan WA, Ajabnoor N, Salamai AA. Leveraging deep learning for risk prediction and resilience in supply chains: insights from critical industries. Journal of Big Data. 2025. doi: 10.1186/s40537-025-01143-4.
11. Zhang، X, Zhang، Y, Liu، X, Wang، R. Blockchain-Based Intelligent Risk Management Decision Support System for Supply Chain Financing. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies (IJIIT). 2025;21(1):1-24. doi: 10.4018/IJIIT.369153.
12. Uvet H, Park A, Dickens J, Oh J, Hazen B. How blockchain technology utilization influences corporate social responsibility through supply chain transparency and the role of supplier risk. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2025. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-04-2024-0245.
13. Rashid A, Baber Ali S, Rasheed R, Amirah NA, Ngah AH. A Paradigm of Blockchain and Supply Chain Performance: A Mediated Model Using Structural Equation Modeling. Kybernetes. 2023;52(12):6163-78. doi: 10.1108/K-04-2022-0543.
14. Xu Z, Gong B, Hu L, Gu H. Supply Chain Finance, FinTech and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from Textual Analysis of China Public companies' Announcements. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2025;61(8):2374-400. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2454990.
15. Abideen AZ, Pyeman J, Sundram VPK, Tseng ML, Sorooshian S. Leveraging Capabilities of Technology into a Circular Supply Chain to Build Circular Business Models: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8997. doi: 10.3390/su13168997.
16. Salehi, Shariati. Evaluating the Impact of Risk Management and Green Supply Chain on Project Success Using Structural Equation Modeling: Case Study of Iranian Defense Industries. Industrial Innovations. 2023;1(2):e706120.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammadjavad Tajik (Author); Mansoureh Moradi Haghighi; Farshad Hajalian, Mehdi Amirmiandaragh (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.