Designing a Learning-Oriented Performance Evaluation Model in the Power Industry

Authors

    Mohammadreza Ebrahimitabar PhD Student, Department of Management, Bon.C., Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran
    Nader Bohlooli * Department of Management, Ta.C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. bohlouli@iau.ac.ir
    Mojtaba Ramezani Department of Business Administration , Bon.C., Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.
    Jafar Beikzad Department of Public Administration , Bon.C., Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.

Keywords:

Performance evaluation, learning organization, power industry, grounded theory, performance management

Abstract

Performance evaluation in infrastructure industries is not merely a control instrument for measuring past results; rather, it plays a decisive role in organizational learning, continuous improvement, and the enhancement of accountability. However, empirical evidence indicates that performance evaluation systems in Iran’s power industry are predominantly grounded in traditional, static, and result-oriented approaches and pay limited attention to organizational learning capacities. The present study was conducted with the aim of designing an indigenous model for performance evaluation based on the learning organization approach in Iran’s power industry. In terms of purpose, this research is applied, and in terms of methodology, it is qualitative and was carried out using the grounded theory strategy. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with experts and managers in the power industry and were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding. The findings led to the identification of the core category of “learning-oriented performance management” and the articulation of its causal, contextual, and intervening conditions, as well as its strategies and consequences. The results indicate that accountability pressures, productivity requirements, and performance transparency, alongside structural and cultural constraints, play a key role in shaping learning-oriented performance evaluation. The proposed model can be used as a practical framework for reforming and enhancing performance evaluation systems in power industry organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Asadi Z. A review of employee performance evaluation in organizations. Scientific Information Database of Iran. 2021.

2. Sherafat S, Khaef Elahi AA, Gholipour A, Danaei Fard H. Development and Construct Validation of Performance Management of Human Resources in Line with Organization Objectives. Public Management Researches. 2018;11(39):33-59. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2018.4010.

3. Örtenblad A. The Oxford handbook of the learning organization: Oxford University Press; 2019.

4. Patwary AK, Alwi MK, Rehman SU, Rabiul MK, Babatunde AY, Alam MMD. Knowledge management practices on innovation performance in the hotel industry: mediated by organizational learning and organizational creativity. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 2024;73(4/5):662-81. doi: 10.1108/GKMC-05-2022-0104.

5. Azimi H, Morshidi A, Abbasi D. The Role of Organizational Learning and Business Processes on Knowledge-Based Organizational Performance (Case Study: Department of Treasury in Zanjan and the Organization of Industry and Mining in Bajnord). Strategic Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management. 2020;3(9):167-209. doi: 10.47176/SMOK.2020.1117.

6. Pradhan RK, Jena LK, Singh SK. Examining the Role of Emotional Intelligence Between Organizational Learning and Adaptive Performance in Indian Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2017;29(3):235-47. doi: 10.1108/jwl-05-2016-0046.

7. Khasmafkan Nezam M, Atafar A, Nasresfahani A, Shahin A. Areview on human capital, organizational learning capability and new product development performance efficiency in automobile industry. Public Management Researches. 2014;7(25):57-74.

8. Evenseth LL, Sydnes M, Gausdal AH. Building organizational resilience through organizational learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Communication. 2022;7:837386. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.837386.

9. Araújo GRKHTDCJM. Dynamic capabilities, strategic planning and performance: a virtuous and mutually reinforcing cycle. Journal of Management & Organization. 2022;28(5):1116-32. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2022.33.

10. Chen SZJ. Influence of Organizational Learning and Dynamic Capability on Organizational Performance of Human Resource Service Enterprises: Moderation Effect of Technology Environment and Market Environment. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:889327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889327.

11. Jiang SG. The impact of management innovation, organizational inertia, and organizational learning on organizational performance: A case study of the manufacturing industry in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China. International Journal of Science and Business. 2023;23(1):91-105.

12. Alshaibani E, Bakır A, Al‐Atwi AA. The Impact of Leadership Behaviors on Organizational Innovative Performance and Learning in AI-driven Industry 5.0 Environments. Development in Learning Organizations an International Journal. 2024;39(3):18-21. doi: 10.1108/dlo-06-2024-0159.

13. Prashar A, Tortorella GL, Sreedharan VR. Role of organizational learning on industry 4.0 awareness and adoption for business performance improvement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2023;71:4904-17. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3235660.

14. Dong B. Performance Prediction of Listed Companies in Smart Healthcare Industry: Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022;2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/8091383.

15. Bocoya Maline J, Rey Moreno M, Calvo Mora A. The EFQM excellence model, the knowledge management process and the corresponding results: an explanatory and predictive study. Review of Managerial Science. 2024;18:1281-315. doi: 10.1007/s11846-023-00653-w.

16. Othman AAE, ElKady MM. A knowledge management based framework for enhancing the learning culture in architectural design firms in developing countries. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. 2023;21(1):23-57. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-01-2021-0027.

17. Yeniaras V, Di Benedetto A, Kaya I, Dayan M. Relational governance, organizational unlearning and learning: implications for performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2021;36(3):469-92. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0002.

18. Mohaghar A, Rezaei A, Karimi M. Investigating the Impact of Total Quality Management Practices on Innovation Performance Through Organizational Learning Capability in the Banking Industry. Journal of Innovation Management. 2019;7(1):34-50.

19. Rozzadeh Zavareh M. Development of an individual performance evaluation model with an emphasis on learning and competency development. Journal of Human Resource Management. 2025;16(1):25-48.

20. Choi S, Lee J. Continuous learning and insurance performance. Journal of Management and Innovation. 2023;10(1):55-70.

21. Riva'i RA, Sukarno G. Analysis of Knowledge Sharing and Learning Organization on Employee Performance Through Employee Engagement at PT Surabaya Industrial Estate Rungkut. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2024;6(1):416-24. doi: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i1.3273.

22. Chen T-C, Tseng C-J. Impact of Web-Based Teaching on the Learning Performance of Education and Training in the Service Industry During COVID-19. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2020;12(2):ep277. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/8581.

23. Han L, Fang J, Zheng Q, George BT, Liao M. Unveiling the effects of livestream studio environment design on sales performance: A machine learning exploration. Industrial Marketing. 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.12.021.

24. Inthavong P, Rehman KU, Masood K, Shaukat Z, Hnydiuk-Stefan A, Ray S. Impact of organizational learning on sustainable firm performance: Intervening effect of organizational networking and innovation. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16177. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16177.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

Submitted

2025-11-10

Revised

2026-02-01

Accepted

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Ebrahimitabar , M. ., Bohlooli, N., Ramezani, M. ., & Beikzad, J. . (2025). Designing a Learning-Oriented Performance Evaluation Model in the Power Industry. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 3(6), 1-11. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/184

Similar Articles

1-10 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.