Designing a Technological Innovation Model for Sustainable Development

Authors

    Mojtaba Sarafzadeh Jahromi Department of management, Deh.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
    Mohammad Hasan Cheraghali * Department of Industrial Management, ST.c., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Mh.cheraghali@iau.ac.ir
    Farshid Farokhizadeh Department of Maintenance Engineering, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran.
    sayyed Mohammadreza Davoodi Department of Management, Deh.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Keywords:

Technological innovation, sustainable development, innovation capability, organizational competence, commercialization, innovation ecosystem, grounded theory

Abstract

The objective of this study is to design a comprehensive technological innovation model that supports sustainable development across organizational, environmental, and socio-economic dimensions. This study employed a qualitative research design composed of a systematic meta-synthesis of existing literature and in-depth expert interviews. The meta-synthesis analyzed a wide range of peer-reviewed studies focusing on technological innovation, sustainability, entrepreneurial ecosystems, and organizational capabilities. In the second phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight experts selected through purposive and snowball sampling, continuing until theoretical saturation was reached. Data collection tools included a structured extraction protocol for literature analysis and an interview guide targeting innovation drivers, organizational strategies, socio-environmental considerations, and commercialization mechanisms. Data analysis followed grounded theory procedures, including open, axial, and selective coding, enabling the integration of extracted concepts into a coherent theoretical model. Constant comparative analysis ensured congruence between literature-derived constructs and expert insights. The analysis revealed that technological innovation emerges from the interaction of multiple systemic components, including organizational competence, technological capability, environmental factors, business models, and commercialization processes. Eight axial categories were identified: organizational competence, sustainable development, business model, organizational characteristics, technological innovation capability, environmental factors, commercialization, and infrastructure. These categories converged into four selective constructs: technological innovation input and regulatory indicators, supporting variables for technological innovation, the technological innovation model, and economic, social, and environmental effects. The inferential results indicate that sustainable innovation is dependent on the alignment of human capital, institutional structures, knowledge flows, socio-environmental values, and market mechanisms. The study concludes that technological innovation for sustainable development is inherently multidimensional, requiring integrated organizational structures, supportive governance frameworks, and dynamic interactions among technological, economic, and social factors. The resulting model offers a holistic framework that organizations and policymakers can adopt to facilitate innovation pathways leading to sustainable outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Weckowska D, Weiss D, Schwäbe C, Dreher C. Technological innovation system analyses and sustainability Transitions: A literature review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2025;54:100935. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2024.100935.

2. Mohammadi S. Urban governance and digital ethics in Islamic cities: A Persian perspective. Iranian Journal of Urban Studies. 2025;10(2):123-45.

3. Zhang Z. Can energy internet improve corporate ESG performance? - Evidence from Chinese high energy-consuming companies. Heliyon. 2024;10(2). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24175.

4. Rosienkiewicz M, Helman J, Cholewa M, Molasy M, Górecka A, Kohen-Vacs D, et al. Enhancing Technology-Focused Entrepreneurship in Higher Education Institutions Ecosystem: Implementing Innovation Models in International Projects. Education Sciences. 2024;14(7):797. doi: 10.3390/educsci14070797.

5. Sampaio C, Sebastião JR. Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: Uncovering Themes, Trends, and Discourse. Administrative Sciences. 2024;14(3). doi: 10.3390/admsci14030053.

6. Posch KEI, Vogel SK, Keller AC, Ziegler JN. More than Mere Deadweight: The Variety of Regulatory Imaginaries that Shape How Regulators, Innovators, and Entrepreneurs Coproduce Disruptive Technological Innovation. 2023.

7. Zhang W, Liu X. The impact of internet on innovation of manufacturing export enterprises: Internal mechanism and micro evidence. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. 2023;8(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100377.

8. Xu Y, Zhao X, Wang J, Xie P. Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation. Technology in Society. 2023;75:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102392.

9. Ahmad Ali K. Identifying the factors inhibiting the development of the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Karafarin University. Innovation Management Journal. 2021;10(2):84-55.

10. Matsumoto M. Sustainable Innovation and Industry Leadership2021. 532-40 p.

11. Pennetta S, Anglani F, Mathews S. Navigating through entrepreneurial skills, competencies and capabilities: a systematic literature review and the development of the entrepreneurial ability model. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 2023;16(4):1144-82. doi: 10.1108/JEEE-09-2022-0257.

12. Portuguez Castro M, Ross Scheede CR, ژ. The Impact of Higher Education on Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study in Mexico. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5597. doi: 10.3390/su11205597.

13. Quelhas OLG, Lima GBA, Ludolf NVE, Meiriño MJ, Abreu C, Anholon R, et al. Engineering education and the development of competencies for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2019;20(4):614-29. doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2018-0125.

14. Yeboah A. Innovation process model: An integration of innovation costs, benefits and core competence. Cogent Business and Management. 2023;10(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2176445.

15. Tong T, Zainudin NB, Yan J, Rahman AA. The Impact of Industry Clusters on the Performance of High Technology Small and Middle Size Enterprises. Sustainability. 2023;15(12). doi: 10.3390/su15129333.

16. Wittenberg C. Challenges for the human-machine interaction in times of digitization, CPS & IIoT, and artificial intelligence in production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022;55(29):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.241.

17. Ullah A, Dogan M, Topcu BA, Saadaoui H. Modeling the impacts of technological innovation and financial development on environmental sustainability: New evidence from the world's top 14 financially developed countries. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2023;50:101229. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101229.

18. Ramadani V, Agarwal S, Caputo A, Agrawal V, Dixit JK. Sustainable competencies of social entrepreneurship for sustainable development: Exploratory analysis from a developing economy. 2022.

19. Tachaboon N. Designing a Tool for Assessing and Developing Technological Innovation Capability Using the Concept of Innovation Capability Maturity Model. With Design: Reinventing Design Modes. 2022:3418-25. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_223.

20. Zhang Z, Liu J. Research on the Teaching Model of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education From the Perspective of Design Thinking. 2020. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.201128.026.

21. Solodikhina AA, Solodikhina Mv. Development of Innovative Competence Model and Its Testing in the Course "Techno-Startup". Integraciâ Obrazovaniâ. 2023;27(2):289-308. doi: 10.15507/1991-9468.111.027.202302.289-308.

22. Ubaid AM, Sahban M, Hammad O, Ramadan A, Abdel-Razek R, editors. Advancing Knowledge in Technological Innovation: Innovation Mapping Model. 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences; 2019.

23. Raju GS, K D. Technological and Sustainable Innovation2024.

24. Zahedifar F, Labadi Z, Parseteh Qombavani F. Explaining and identifying the entrepreneurial competencies of faculty members of the country's universities with a data-based approach. Research in Medical Sciences Education. 2021;13(2):58-69. doi: 10.52547/rme.13.2.58.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Submitted

2025-09-17

Revised

2025-12-11

Accepted

2025-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sarafzadeh Jahromi, M., Cheraghali, M. H., Farokhizadeh, F. ., & Davoodi , sayyed M. . (2026). Designing a Technological Innovation Model for Sustainable Development. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 4(2), 1-14. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/101

Similar Articles

1-10 of 178

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.