Exploring the Role of Interpersonal Trust in Facilitating Knowledge Exchange and Collaboration in Cross-Functional Teams

Authors

    Ramin Fouladi Department of Accounting, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran
    Negar Aghili * Department of Economics, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran Aghilineeegar12@gmail.com

Keywords:

Interpersonal trust, cross-functional teams, knowledge exchange, collaboration, qualitative research, psychological safety, organizational behavior

Abstract

This study aims to explore how interpersonal trust facilitates knowledge exchange and collaboration among members of cross-functional teams in organizational settings. Using a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 29 professionals from diverse industries in Tehran who had direct experience working in cross-functional teams. Participants were selected via purposive sampling to ensure relevance to the study objectives. Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Each session lasted between 45 to 75 minutes and was transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo software, following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach. Trustworthiness was enhanced through strategies such as member checking, peer debriefing, and maintaining an audit trail. Three major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Foundations of Interpersonal Trust, including subthemes such as communication openness, psychological safety, and role clarity; (2) Enablers of Knowledge Exchange, including informal interactions, competence-based trust, leadership support, and feedback acceptance; and (3) Collaboration Outcomes and Challenges, highlighting trust’s role in enhancing synergy, innovation, and conflict resolution, as well as the detrimental effects of mistrust and knowledge hoarding. Participants consistently emphasized that trust enabled deeper collaboration, reduced information silos, and fostered a learning-oriented environment. Interpersonal trust is a critical enabler of effective collaboration and knowledge sharing in cross-functional teams. It facilitates both the relational and cognitive dimensions of teamwork by fostering psychological safety, mutual respect, and open communication. Organizations seeking to improve cross-functional performance should actively cultivate trust through leadership practices, structural supports, and team-building initiatives. This study contributes to a nuanced understanding of trust as a dynamic and context-sensitive phenomenon in collaborative work settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.11851845

Bijlsma-Frankema, K., & Costa, A. C. (2005). Understanding the trust–control nexus. International Sociology, 20(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055477

Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006

Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007

Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909

Costa, A. C., Fulmer, C. A., & Anderson, N. (2022). Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2541

Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302–330). Sage.

Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305

Ferrin, D. L., Dirks, K. T., & Shah, P. P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.870

Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015615

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383

Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114–139). Sage.

Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2019). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000363

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727

Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180265

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Palanski, M. E., Cullen, K. L., Gentry, W. A., & Nichols, C. M. (2011). Virtuous leadership: Exploring the effects of leader courage and behavioral integrity on leader performance and follower commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1020-1

Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410

Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393957

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

Submitted

2023-08-10

Revised

2023-09-09

Accepted

2023-09-21

How to Cite

Fouladi, R., & Aghili, N. (2023). Exploring the Role of Interpersonal Trust in Facilitating Knowledge Exchange and Collaboration in Cross-Functional Teams. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1(4), 47-55. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/30

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.