Structural Dimensions of Resource Waste in Iran: A Multidimensional Barrier to Sustainable Development

Authors

    Gholamreza Ghafari Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
    Mohammad Reza Hosseini Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Borujerd, Iran
    Hadi Zamani * PhD Student, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran , Kish International Campus, Kish,Iran hadizamani1404@yahoo.com
    Rasool Mehmandoost Chief of Sustainability & Social Responsibility, Mobarakeh Steel Company, Isfahan, Iran

Keywords:

Resource Waste, Governance, Knowledge Waste, Systemic Constraints, Institutional Reform, Sustainable Development

Abstract

This study introduces a multidimensional framework for analyzing resource waste in Iran, shifting the focus from conventional technical and managerial perspectives to deeper structural and institutional dynamics. Resource waste is categorized into six domains—political, economic, human, knowledge-based, cultural–social, and systemic—and assessed using expert evaluations and psychometric validation tools. The findings reveal that governance inefficiencies, lack of meritocracy, opaque privatization practices, and intellectual marginalization are key drivers of waste. Two conceptual innovations are proposed: Knowledge Waste, defined as the failure to convert intellectual capital into actionable development strategies, and Systemic Constraints as Waste, highlighting how centralized control and restricted access to information hinder reform and institutional learning. These insights suggest that resource waste in Iran is not merely a technical or administrative issue, but a reflection of deeper misalignments in governance, policy, and institutional culture. Addressing it requires coordinated reforms across legal frameworks, educational systems, and civic institutions. Policy recommendations include enhancing transparency and accountability, reforming privatization policies, integrating academic expertise into policymaking, and cultivating merit-based leadership. While the framework is grounded in the Iranian context, its multidimensional structure offers analytical relevance for other post-transition and developing societies facing similar institutional challenges. The proposed model provides a foundation for future research and policy innovation aimed at sustainable development, particularly in contexts where structural inefficiencies and governance limitations impede progress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; 1776.

2. Rostow WW. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1960.

3. Tinbergen J. Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1965.

4. Prebisch R. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America, 1950.

5. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press; 1974.

6. Myrdal G. The Challenge of World Poverty: A World Anti-Poverty Program in Outline. New York: Pantheon Books; 1970.

7. Merton RK. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press; 1949.

8. Merton RK. On the Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press; 1968.

9. Sachs W. Debates on sustainable development: Towards a holistic view of reality. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2005;7(4):501-18. doi: 10.1007/s10668-005-7314-3.

10. Jacobson R, Boadi K, Kuitunen M, Hanninen K. Urbanisation without development: Environmental and health implications in African cities. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2005;7(4):465-500. doi: 10.1007/s10668-005-7313-4.

11. Mostaghimi M, Behnamian A. Cleaner production strategies in emerging economies: A circular economy perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02345-9.

12. Ram A, Bracci L. Waste indicators and SDG alignment: A cross-sectoral policy review. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04567-3.

13. Ren J. Editorial overview: Sustainable development and economic resilience. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024;26(12). doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03899-2.

14. Imf. Islamic Republic of Iran: Country Report. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2023.

15. Ghasemi M. Public sector productivity in Iran: A critical review. Iranian Economic Review. 2023;27(1):45-62.

16. Nasiri M. Analysis of the privatization of Iran Telecommunication Company. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Development. 2016;23(4):55-72.

17. Beigi AA. Parliamentary speech opposing the Minister of Health nominee 2017. Available from: https://www.icana.ir.

18. Akbari M. Review of the Imperial Inspection Organization Reports. Tehran: Pazhuhesh Publishing; 2006.

19. Fao, Unep. Progress on food waste reduction towards SDG 12.3. United Nations Environment Programme, 2023.

20. Fao. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2023.

21. Saba. Annual Report on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Tehran: Iran Energy Efficiency Organization, 2023.

22. Klein LL, Vieira KM, Alves AC, Pissutti M. Demystifying the eighth lean waste: A knowledge waste scale. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2023;40(8):1876-98. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-01-2022-0020.

23. Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.

24. Delibasic M. Socio-cultural capital as a cause of economic and institutional crisis in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics & Sociology. 2018;11(4):182-97. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/14.

25. Khan D, Khan N, Ullah S. Harnessing hybrid intelligence and explainable AI for urban growth prediction: A data-driven framework for sustainable cities. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2025;27(8). doi: 10.1007/s10668-025-06860-7.

26. Yazdanpanah M, Mousavi M, Sieber S. Agricultural land use change in fertile areas in Southwestern Iran: Lessons learned from a qualitative study. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2025;27(8). doi: 10.1007/s10668-025-06800-5.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

Submitted

2025-05-03

Revised

2025-07-18

Accepted

2025-07-26

How to Cite

Ghafari , G. ., Hosseini, . M. R. ., Zamani, H., & Mehmandoost , . R. . (2025). Structural Dimensions of Resource Waste in Iran: A Multidimensional Barrier to Sustainable Development. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 3(4), 1-21. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/166

Similar Articles

51-60 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.