Building Brand Resilience in Digital Markets: The Interplay of Brand Authenticity, Consumer Trust, and Emotional Attachment During Reputational Crises
Keywords:
Brand authenticity, Brand resilience, Consumer trust, Emotional attachment, Reputational crisis, Digital markets, Structural equation modelingAbstract
This study aimed to examine the direct and indirect effects of brand authenticity on brand resilience during reputational crises in digital markets, with particular emphasis on the mediating roles of consumer trust and emotional attachment. This quantitative, cross-sectional explanatory study was conducted in Tehran, Iran, in 2026 among 412 adult consumers who were active users of digital platforms and had encountered a reputational crisis involving a familiar brand during the previous 12 months. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring brand authenticity, consumer trust, emotional attachment, and consumer-perceived brand resilience. The measurement instruments demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM SPSS AMOS. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to assess the measurement model, structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized direct relationships, and bias-corrected bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples was employed to evaluate indirect effects. Brand authenticity significantly predicted consumer trust (β = .638, p < .001), emotional attachment (β = .512, p < .001), and brand resilience (β = .218, p < .001). Consumer trust (β = .414, p < .001) and emotional attachment (β = .263, p < .001) also had significant positive effects on brand resilience. The model explained 61.2% of the variance in brand resilience. Brand authenticity exerted significant indirect effects on brand resilience through consumer trust (β = .264, 95% CI [.198, .342]) and emotional attachment (β = .135, 95% CI [.081, .203]). The total indirect effect was .399, while the total effect of brand authenticity on brand resilience was .617, indicating complementary partial mediation. Brand resilience in digital markets is strongly shaped by authenticity-based relational resources, with consumer trust functioning as the most influential mediating mechanism and emotional attachment providing an additional affective pathway through which authentic brands can better withstand and recover from reputational crises.
Downloads
References
1. Rosário AT, Dias JC. Marketing Strategies on Social Media Platforms. International Journal of E-Business Research. 2023;19(1):1-25. doi: 10.4018/ijebr.316969.
2. Abashidze I. The Influence of Online Platforms on Decision-Making Process and Behavioural Traits of International Travelers. European Scientific Journal Esj. 2024;20(37):51. doi: 10.19044/esj.2024.v20n37p51.
3. Ramzah N, Dayang Haryani Diana Ag D, Samat MF, Ambad SNA. Making Micro Business Visible: Unlocking the Potential Through Social Media. 2024;133:Noorhaizah-694. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2024.05.56.
4. Kapoor S, Banerjee S. On the Relationship Between Brand Scandal and Consumer Attitudes: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2020;45(5):1047-78. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12633.
5. Xiayu S. Navigating Corporate Brand Crisis Management in the Network Environment: An in-Depth Analysis. Jmbi Unsrat (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi). 2024;11(1):256-70. doi: 10.35794/jmbi.v11i1.53442.
6. Singh SJA. Online Reputation Management: Strategies for Building and Protecting Brand Image. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology. 2023;44(4):4490-7. doi: 10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.1698.
7. Nkrumah D. Managing Online Reputation in the Age of Cancel Culture. Journal of Public Relations. 2024;2(1):25-37. doi: 10.47941/jpr.1696.
8. Dejene B. Samsung’s Crisis Communication Response: Ineffective Response Strategies Across Traditional and Social Media Platforms. 2022. doi: 10.32920/ryerson.14643882.v1.
9. Walsh K-E. Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: Using Situational Crisis Communication Theory to Analyze Communication Practices on YouTube. 2024. doi: 10.32920/25412836.
10. Behera RK, Bala PK, Rana NP, Kizgin H. A Techno-Business Platform to Improve Customer Experience Following the Brand Crisis Recovery: A B2B Perspective. Information Systems Frontiers. 2022;24(6):2027-51. doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10231-8.
11. Noor T. Reviewing the Challenging Factors of Survival During COVID 19 Uncertainty. International Journal on Social Science Economics and Art. 2022;11(4):150-64. doi: 10.35335/ijosea.v11i4.60.
12. Bovsh L, Bosovska M, Охріменко А, Rasulova А. Digital Security of the Hotel Brand. Menadzment U Hotelijerstvu I Turizmu. 2023;11(1):145-63. doi: 10.5937/menhottur2301145b.
13. Şenyapar HND. Healthcare Branding and Reputation Management Strategies for Organizational Success. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 2024;55:26-53. doi: 10.47577/tssj.v55i1.10690.
14. Semande F. Political Public Relations and Image Management. Journal of Public Relations. 2024;2(1):38-49. doi: 10.47941/jpr.1697.
15. Ikwue U, Nwankwo EE, Eyo-Udo NL, Ekwezia AV, Ihemereze KC, Daraojimba C. The Interplay of History and Modern Trade: A Review on How Historical Narratives Shape Consumer Perceptions and Purchase Decisions. Economic Growth and Environment Sustainability. 2023;2(1):30-9. doi: 10.26480/egnes.01.2023.30.39.
16. Horvat S. National Brand Identity: Pilot Study on Perception of Croatian Student Population. Entrenova - Enterprise Research Innovation. 2021;7(1):217-32. doi: 10.54820/utsq4691.
17. Pai H. A Case Study on the Impact of Brand Image on Customer Buying Behaviour With Special Reference to Nilgiris Supermarket in Mangalore. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. 2024;08(01):1-10. doi: 10.55041/ijsrem28211.
18. Reynolds S. Consumer Perceptions of Ethical Supply Chains and Their Effect on Brand Loyalty. 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202406.1074.v1.
19. Gaspar A, Pinto JC. The Good Bank: Preference of Banking Institutions Based on Perceptions of Corporate Environmental and Social Causes. Frontiers in Behavioral Economics. 2024;2. doi: 10.3389/frbhe.2023.1330861.
20. Safeer AA, Le TT. Transforming Customers Into Evangelists: Influence of Online Brand Experience on Relationship Quality and Brand Evangelism in the Banking Industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2023;35(12):2947-64. doi: 10.1108/apjml-12-2022-1018.
21. Mehmood S, Hamid M. Online Brand Attachment, Experience, and Sales Promotion Leads to Purchase Intention: Moderating Role of Online Brand Trust. Journal of Management Practices Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;8(1). doi: 10.33152/jmphss-8.1.5.
22. Yu CMJ. The Application Practice of Sports Marketing and Branding in Social Media: A Case Study of Li-Ning. Highlights in Business Economics and Management. 2023;23:1071-81. doi: 10.54097/v3rhfp55.
23. Summak ME. Influencer marketıng and publıc relatıons. Journal of Business & Finance in Emerging Markets. 2023;6(2):67-76. doi: 10.32770/jbfem.vol667-76.
24. Yuan D, Lin Z, Filieri R, Liu R, Zheng M. Managing the Product-Harm Crisis in the Digital Era: The Role of Consumer Online Brand Community Engagement. Journal of Business Research. 2020;115:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.044.
25. Ren R, Yan B. Online Faith-Holder Communities in Crisis: Proposing and Testing a Dual-Challenge Model. Corporate Communications an International Journal. 2024;29(6):988-1012. doi: 10.1108/ccij-05-2023-0069.
26. Silva JMd, Rosário AT, Gestoso CG, Romana FA. Fake News in Marketing. 2023. doi: 10.20944/preprints202305.1630.v1.
27. Nagpal S, Gupta G. Impact of Pandemic Communication on Brand-Specific Outcomes: Testing the Moderating Role of Brand Attitude and Product Category. Journal of Creative Communications. 2022;18(3):257-73. doi: 10.1177/09732586211067840.
28. Raposo J, Terra CF. Economia Da Partilha E Práticas De Comunicação Organizacional Em Tempos De Covid-19: Social Brands No Brasil E Em Portugal. Comunicação E Sociedade. 2021;39:39-56. doi: 10.17231/comsoc.39(2021).2851.
29. Chang Z. Research on the Marketing Strategy of Galanz Company. Financial Engineering and Risk Management. 2024;7(3). doi: 10.23977/ferm.2024.070301.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maryam Emamjomeh; Sepehr Ashoori (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.