Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Stakeholder Trust and Corporate Reputation in the Banking Industry
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Stakeholder Trust, Corporate Reputation, Banking Sector, Qualitative Research, Organizational Integration, Strategic CommunicationAbstract
This study aimed to explore how corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives influence stakeholder trust and corporate reputation within the banking industry. A qualitative research design was employed using semi-structured interviews to collect in-depth data from 22 participants, including bank managers, CSR officers, employees, and long-term clients in Tehran. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure relevance and diversity in perspectives. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis facilitated by NVivo software. The analytical process followed Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework, allowing the identification of key themes and subthemes that emerged organically from the data. Three primary themes were identified: stakeholder trust development, CSR as a reputation enhancer, and organizational integration of CSR. Subthemes included transparent communication, ethical banking practices, community engagement, value alignment, media visibility, and leadership commitment. Participants emphasized that authentic, well-communicated, and strategically embedded CSR practices enhance stakeholder trust by signaling ethical intent and responsiveness to social concerns. Additionally, CSR contributed to a favorable corporate image, brand differentiation, and reputational resilience in times of crisis. Internal factors such as cross-departmental collaboration, employee involvement, and CSR performance evaluation were also critical in operationalizing CSR effectively. CSR plays a vital role in cultivating stakeholder trust and enhancing corporate reputation in the banking sector, especially when integrated into the organization’s values, leadership agenda, and strategic communications. Trust and reputation are not isolated outcomes but are co-constructed through consistent, authentic CSR engagement with internal and external stakeholders. These findings offer both theoretical insights and practical guidance for banks aiming to strengthen their stakeholder relationships through meaningful CSR strategies.
Downloads
References
Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
Fernando, M., & Sim, A. B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: A study of four MNCs. Business and Society, 50(2), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309336458
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/256324
Glavas, A., & Piderit, S. K. (2009). How does doing good matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2009(36), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2009.wi.00008
Hoseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Salehi, M. (2014). Investigating the relationship between CSR and corporate reputation in Iranian banks. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(9), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i9/1170
Hur, W. M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2014). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1910-0
Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1943
Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., & Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9100-y
Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting skepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280910998763
Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4
Wang, H., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.