A Qualitative Model for Developing Human Resource Management Policies to Prevent Quiet Quitting in the General Departments of Roads and Urban Development of the Country

Authors

    Zahra Kamangary Department of Public Administration, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
    Maryam Bayani * Department of Public Administration, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran M.Bayani@gorganiau.ac.ir
    Ali Farhadi Mahalli Department of Public Administration, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran

Keywords:

Policymaking, Human Resource Management, Quiet Quitting

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Quiet quitting, as one of the emerging challenges in human resource management, can significantly impact the productivity and sustainability of organizations. The present study aims to present a qualitative model for developing human resource management policies with an approach to preventing quiet quitting in the General Departments of Roads and Urban Development of the country.

Methods: The statistical population of the present qualitative study included organizational and academic experts with lived experience, and sampling continued until theoretical saturation. For this purpose, a total of 20 interviews were conducted. The interviews were semi-structured (lasting between 40 to 75 minutes), and the data analysis method in the qualitative section was based on open coding, axial coding, and selective coding.

Findings: The results showed that 33 conceptual codes were categorized into causal conditions (2 factors), contextual conditions (3 factors), intervening conditions (7 factors), actions and strategies (5 factors), and consequences (3 factors). In the final qualitative model, the causal factors were categorized as “Organizational Re-engineering,” contextual conditions as “Formation of a New Perspective on Human Resources,” intervening conditions as “Organizational Policies” and “Transparency-Based Management,” actions and strategies as “Knowledge-Based Human Resource Architecture,” and consequences as “Human Capital Excellence.” The reliability of the model was determined to be 0.8 using the inter-coder agreement method, indicating good reliability for the qualitative model.

Conclusion: In general, it can be stated that to prevent quiet quitting in the General Departments of Roads and Urban Development, human resource policymakers must adopt a transformative approach. Re-engineering organizational structures and processes, along with fostering a new perspective on employees, can enhance motivation and mutual trust. The practical application of this model helps managers prevent a decline in employee commitment and motivation, thereby driving the organization’s human capital towards excellence and sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Atalay M, Dağıstan U. Quiet Quitting: A New Wine In an old Bottle? Personnel Review. 2023;53(4):1059-74. doi: 10.1108/pr-02-2023-0122.

2. Serenko A. The Human Capital Management Perspective on Quiet Quitting: Recommendations for Employees, Managers, and National Policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2023;28(1):27-43. doi: 10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0792.

3. Sarwar A, Rahman S, Sarif SM, Seng VOK. Quiet Quitting: A Millennial Perspective on Workplace Dissatisfaction and Retention Challenges. European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance. 2024;20(1):511-7. doi: 10.34190/ecmlg.20.1.3083.

4. Pevec N. The Concept of Identifying Factors of Quiet Quitting in Organizations: An Integrative Literature Review. Izzivi Prihodnosti. 2024;8(2, May 2023). doi: 10.37886/ip.2023.006.

5. Tessema MT, Gok D, Gok K, Kibreab N, Berak MT. Human Resource Management in the Post-Pandemic Era, the Case of the United States of America. Global Journal of Human Resource Management. 2024;12(2):112-30. doi: 10.37745/gjhrm.2013/vol12n2112130.

6. Kehinde S, Moses C, Borishade T, Kehinde O, Simon-Ilogho B, Kehinde T, et al. A Study of Great Resignation on Work-Life Balance: Global Perspective. International Journal of Finance Economics and Business. 2023;2(4):280-300. doi: 10.56225/ijfeb.v2i4.229.

7. Georgiadou A, Vezyridis P, Glaveli Ν. “You Pretend to Pay Me; I Pretend to Work”: A Multi‐Level Exploration of Quiet Quitting in the Greek Context. Human Resource Management. 2025;64(4):923-41. doi: 10.1002/hrm.22292.

8. Xueyun Z, Mamun AA, Masukujjaman M, Rahman MK, Gao J, Yang Q. Modelling the Significance of Organizational Conditions on Quiet Quitting Intention Among Gen Z Workforce in an Emerging Economy. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3.

9. Samsudin A, Ikaningtiyas M, Mulia F, Rintalla M. Exploring the Relationship Between Career Advancement, Work-Life Balance, and Corporate Financial Performance: A Systematic Review. Atestasi Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi. 2024;7(2):1091-110. doi: 10.57178/atestasi.v7i2.918.

10. Singh P, Sreehitha L, Kumar V, Rajak BK, Sarkar S. Profiling Employee Engagement Dimensions and Outcomes: A person-Centered Approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2024;73(10):3252-77. doi: 10.1108/ijppm-08-2023-0426.

11. Khalid O, Myers L, Baddour LJ, Williams A. Strategies for Enhancing Governmental Public Health Workforce Well-Being and Retention. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2023;29(4):601-3. doi: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001770.

12. Kendrick T, Artley JB, Mujtaba BG. Mental Health Intervention in the Workplace Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. Health. 2023;15(04):289-311. doi: 10.4236/health.2023.154021.

13. Leclercq C, Hansez I. Temporal Stages of Burnout: How to Design Prevention? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024;21(12):1617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121617.

14. Miller C, Pharris AB, Hellman CM, Swann J. A Model of Hope as a Protective Measure to Lower Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Employees Working in Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities Services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2023;37(2). doi: 10.1111/jar.13184.

15. Zábó V, Ceglédi A, Buda A, Varga P, Fekete M, Fazekas‐Pongor V, et al. The Role of Burnout Prevention in Promoting Healthy Aging: Frameworks for the Semmelweis Study and Semmelweis-EUniWell Workplace Health Promotion Program. Geroscience. 2025;47(5):6377-98. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01780-w.

16. Galanis P, Moisoglou I, Katsiroumpa A, Μαλλιαρού Μ, Vraka I, Gallos P, et al. Impact of Workplace Bullying on Quiet Quitting in Nurses: The Mediating Effect of Coping Strategies. 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202403.0560.v1.

17. Moisoglou I, Katsiroumpa A, Katsapi A, Konstantakopoulou O, Galanis P. Poor Nurses’ Work Environment Increases Quiet Quitting and Reduces Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece. Nursing Reports. 2025;15(1):19. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15010019.

18. Galanis P, Katsiroumpa A, Vraka I, Σίσκου Ό, Konstantakopoulou O, Κατσούλας Θ, et al. Nurses Quietly Quit Their Job More Often Than Other Healthcare Workers: An Alarming Issue for Healthcare Services. International Nursing Review. 2024;71(4):850-9. doi: 10.1111/inr.12931.

19. Koelhi T, Lidströmer N. Silent Resignations: Navigating Moral Distress in Healthcare - A Literature Review on Quiet Quitting. 2024. doi: 10.33774/coe-2024-dxxq3.

20. Rinaldi S, Pomarolli E. Quiet Quitting Among Nurses: A Case Study in a Northern Italian Hospital. Nursing Reports. 2025;15(7):239. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070239.

21. Othman AA, MohamedMahran H, Ali HI. Covering Loyalty Policy in Quiet Firing Workplace: The Association Between Quiet Quitting, Intention to Leave and Nurses' Loyalty. 2025. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6176264/v1.

22. Ergen H, Gılıç F, Yücedağlar A, İnandı Y. Leadership Styles and Quiet Quitting in School Context: Unveiling Mobbing as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1538444.

23. Xu Q, Yu Z, Fan S, Wu Y, Wang Y, Zou D, et al. The Effect of Temporal Leadership on Quiet Quitting Among Primary Healthcare Workers: The Chain-Mediating Role of Time Management Competency and Work-Family Enrichment and Moderating Role of Organizational Communication. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1616354.

24. Steffey MA, Griffon DJ, Risselada M, Scharf VF, Buote NJ, Zamprogno H, et al. Veterinarian Burnout Demographics and Organizational Impacts: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2023;10. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1184526.

25. Gün İ, Kutun FÇ, Söyük S. Mediating Effect of Turnover Intention on the Relationship Between Job Burnout and Quiet Quitting in Nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2025;81(10):6569-77. doi: 10.1111/jan.16807.

26. Perveen Y, Raza A, Khan MJ, Matloob S, Jaboob AS. Burnout and Beyond: Exploring How Work Environment, Self‐Efficacy, and Emotional Exhaustion and Job Security Drive Quitting Intentions Among Newly Recruited Teachers in Sindh, Pakistan. Psychology in the Schools. 2025;62(9):3638-53. doi: 10.1002/pits.23564.

27. Seyffert M, Wu C, Özkan‐Seely GF. Insights Into the Impact of Organizational Factors and Burnout on the Employees of a for-Profit Psychiatric Hospital During the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024;21(4):484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040484.

28. Adeusi KB, Amajuoyi P, Benjami LB. Utilizing Machine Learning to Predict Employee Turnover in High-Stress Sectors. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. 2024;6(5):1702-32. doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i5.1143.

29. Alami R, Stachowicz-Stanusch A, Agarwal S, Masaeid TA. Predicting Quiet Quitting: Machine Learning Insights Into Silent Resignations in Healthcare Industry. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2024;3(4):3444-62. doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i4.3864.

30. Guo J, Huang D, Wu J, Mogouie H, Dicke T. Predictive Modelling of Australian School Principals’ Turnover Intentions Using Machine Learning With Random Effects. 2025. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7168703/v1.

31. Zhang D, Zheng H, Zeng Y, Yu X, Zhao Y, Gan YX, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Quiet Quitting Scale. BMC Nursing. 2025;24(1). doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02921-4.

32. Tok HH, Uzun LN. Investigating Quiet Quitting Tendencies Among Nursing Students: A Descriptive Study. BMC Nursing. 2025;24(1). doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03565-0.

33. Stanković M, Slavković M. Quality of Work Life Determinants of Healthcare Professionals’ Quiet Quitting: Towards Individual Difference. Healthcare. 2025;13(13):1547. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131547.

34. Gilles I, Saux C, Zuercher E, Jubin J, Roth L, Bachmann AO, et al. Work Experiences of Healthcare Professionals in a Shortage Context: Analysis of Open-Ended Comments in a Swiss Cohort (SCOHPICA). BMC Health Services Research. 2025;25(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12659-z.

35. Geng R, Xiu-lin G, Geng S. Identifying Key Antecedents of Quiet Quitting Among Nurses: A Cross‐Profession Meta‐Analytic Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2025;82(1):913-33. doi: 10.1111/jan.16934.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2026-03-11

Revised

2026-04-28

Accepted

2026-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kamangary, Z. ., Bayani, M., & Farhadi Mahalli, A. . (2026). A Qualitative Model for Developing Human Resource Management Policies to Prevent Quiet Quitting in the General Departments of Roads and Urban Development of the Country. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-16. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/302

Similar Articles

1-10 of 214

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.