The Impact of Organizational Ethical Culture on the Quality of Sustainability Reporting with the Mediating Role of Environmental Governance
Keywords:
Organizational Ethical Culture, Sustainability Reporting Quality, Environmental Governance, Structural Equation Modeling, GreenwashingAbstract
This study was conducted with the aim of examining the impact of organizational ethical culture on the quality of sustainability reporting with the mediating role of environmental governance in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Given the increasing demand for transparent and credible disclosure of sustainability information, understanding the organizational determinants affecting reporting quality is of considerable importance. The research design was quantitative and descriptive–analytical, and data were collected through standardized questionnaires and content analysis of sustainability reports from 112 active companies in 2024. Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4 and SPSS version 27. The findings indicated that organizational ethical culture has a positive and statistically significant relationship with the quality of sustainability reporting (β = 0.34). Furthermore, environmental governance not only has a direct positive effect on reporting quality (β = 0.41), but also plays a statistically significant mediating role in the relationship between ethical culture and sustainability reporting quality (indirect effect: β = 0.19). These results emphasize that enhancing the quality of sustainability reporting requires the integration of ethical orientations with formal governance structures. The findings contribute to the theoretical development of sustainability accounting and provide practical guidance for boards of directors, regulators, and organizations in emerging economies.
Downloads
References
1. Wang L, Smith J. Social Role Theory and Auditor Environmental Accountability: A Multinational Study. Journal of Accounting Research. 2025;63(1):123-50.
2. Garcia M, Thompson P. Institutional Pressures and Auditor Behavior in Environmental Reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2024;105:101-20.
3. Soltani M, Rezaei E, Mirzaei K. The impact of stakeholder pressures on auditors' accountability behavior regarding environmental issues. Iranian Advanced Accounting Journal. 2025;5(1):102-23.
4. Rajabi M. The impact of cultural differences and professional norms on environmental auditors' behavior. International Journal of Auditing and Professional Ethics. 2025;4(1):50-72.
5. Filsaraei M, Sadeghi MS. The Impact of Professional Ethics, Social Structure, and Religious Attitude on Auditors' Judgments: A Comparison of the Environments in India and Iran. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance. 2024;8(4):51-69.
6. Shad S, & Zeinali, M., & Mohammadi, A., & Badavar Nahandi, Y. The Psychological Role of WorkPlace and Organizational Socialization in Improving Auditors' Ethics by Reducing Deviant Behaviors. Journal of Financial and Behavioral Researches in Accounting. 2021;1(1):87-106.
7. Molaei A. Organizational Environment and Whistleblowing Mindset Among Internal Auditors. Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting. 2024;8(92):1996-2011.
8. Najafi R. The theory of the social role of auditors and predicting accountability behavior in environmental issues. Journal of Accounting and Management Sciences. 2025;6(3):138-55.
9. Kamali M. The role of auditors in maintaining social legitimacy of organizations with a focus on environmental reporting. Management Research Journal. 2025;12(2):75-90.
10. Nasiri A, Hosseini N. Investigating the impact of international auditing standards on accountability in environmental reports. Quarterly Journal of Management and Auditing. 2025;10(3):88-102.
11. Alipour K, Mohammadi S, Asadi B. The role of modern technologies in improving environmental auditors' accountability. Journal of Information Technology and Auditing. 2025;1(1):34-50.
12. Wan L, Zheng H, Kong D. Methodological Innovation in Government Environmental Auditing Through Biomechanical Principles: An Approach to Environmental Impact Performance Evaluation. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2025;22(4):1704. doi: 10.62617/mcb1704.
13. Tan J, Hua M, Chan KC. Do anticipated government environmental audits improve firm productivity? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2024;61:104985. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.104985.
14. Song Y, He H, Li J, Ao T. Environmental Audit and Green Innovative Strategy of Enterprise in China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2024;33(1). doi: 10.15244/pjoes/171580.
15. Lawal OA, Jimoh AA, Abdullah KA, Bello BA, Awoyemi ED. Economic and environmental impact of energy audit and efficiency: A report from a Nigeria household. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2024;79:101387. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101387.
16. Asadiyan Owghani A, Hajiha Z, Royaee RA, Vakilifard H. The effect of Self-Interest Threat on ethical sensitivity, mediating role of moral intensity. Iranian journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2021;6(11):41-66. doi: 10.52547/aapc.6.11.41.
17. Hashemi Tilenoi M, Nikkar J. the effect of audit quality indicators, competitive environment and corporate governance on the unethical behavior of managers, with an emphasis on the two dimensions of the decision-making horizon and the type of prediction in managers' behavior. Accounting Knowledge. 2023;12(3):147-68.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Reza Razdar; Reza Jahanshiri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
