Middle Managers as Change Agents: A Grounded Theory Approach
Keywords:
Middle managers, Change agents, Organizational change, Grounded theoryAbstract
The objective of this study was to explore how middle managers in Brazilian organizations enact their roles as change agents, highlighting the strategies they use, the challenges they face, and the identity negotiations they undertake during organizational transformation. A qualitative grounded theory methodology was employed to generate an empirically grounded conceptual understanding of middle managers’ roles in change processes. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 middle managers from diverse industries in Brazil, selected purposively to ensure variation in perspectives. Interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was reached, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo 14 software. Analysis followed the grounded theory procedures of open, axial, and selective coding, with constant comparison and memo writing applied throughout the process to ensure analytical rigor and depth. Three overarching categories emerged from the analysis. First, navigating organizational change highlighted challenges such as adapting to structural shifts, communication ambiguities, balancing dual expectations, resource constraints, and informal learning. Second, middle managers as change enablers revealed proactive strategies including building trust, motivating employees, facilitating collaboration, coaching and mentoring, translating strategies into practice, and acting as role models. Third, personal and professional identity in change captured both growth opportunities and strains, encompassing professional development, emotional burden, identity negotiation, resilience-building, and ethical dilemmas. Participant narratives underscored middle managers’ dual role as both implementers and interpreters of change, mediating between organizational demands and human concerns. The study demonstrates that middle managers are central actors in organizational change, operating simultaneously as translators, enablers, and identity negotiators. By illuminating their experiences within the Brazilian context, the findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the relational, structural, and personal dimensions of change leadership. Practical implications highlight the need for organizational support structures that empower and sustain middle managers in fulfilling their critical change-agent roles.
Downloads
References
Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879079
Balogun, J. (2003). From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential: Creating change intermediaries. British Journal of Management, 14(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00262
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159600
Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133–141.
Brown, A. D. (2015). Identities and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12035
Burnes, B. (2017). Organizational change: Theories and practice (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
Caldwell, R. (2003). Models of change agency: A fourfold classification. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00270
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1997). Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00059
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Huy, Q. N. (2002). Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 31–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094890
Huy, Q. N. (2011). How middle managers’ group‐focus emotions and social identities influence strategy implementation. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1387–1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.961
Kanter, R. M. (1982). The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Business Review, 60(4), 95–105.
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.002
Rodrigues, S. B., & Child, J. (2012). Building social capital for internationalization. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 16(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000100003
Rouleau, L., & Balogun, J. (2011). Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 953–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00941.x
Thomas, R., & Hardy, C. (2011). Reframing resistance to organizational change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2011.05.004
Wood, T., Tonelli, M. J., & Cooke, B. (2011). Colonization and corporatization: A critical review of Brazilian management. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422041111149577
Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. (2008). The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1190–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324326
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.