The Impact of Organizational Communication on Innovation in Startups
Keywords:
Organizational communication, innovation, startups, communication channels, organizational culture, resource allocation, creativityAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of organizational communication on innovation within startups, with a focus on how communication channels, culture, and organizational support influence the innovation process. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews as the primary data collection method. A purposive sample of 26 participants from startups in Tehran, including employees, managers, and founders, was selected. The interviews were analyzed using NVivo software, employing thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes related to communication practices and innovation. Theoretical saturation was reached after conducting 26 interviews, ensuring the robustness of the findings. The study found that both formal and informal communication channels significantly contribute to fostering innovation in startups. Formal communication, such as meetings and reports, provides structure and alignment, while informal communication encourages creativity and spontaneous idea generation. Organizational culture, characterized by openness, transparency, and trust, was identified as a key driver of innovation, as it facilitates collaboration and knowledge sharing. Additionally, organizational support in the form of resource allocation, dedicated time for innovation, and recognition of creative efforts was crucial for fostering an innovative environment. Organizational communication plays a critical role in driving innovation within startups. By optimizing communication channels, fostering an open and supportive culture, and providing resources for innovation, startups can enhance their capacity for creativity and problem-solving. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature on the intersection of communication and innovation, particularly within the unique context of startups.
Downloads
References
Agarwal, R., Sarkar, M., & Madsen, T. L. (2017). Knowledge sharing in innovation processes: A multidimensional framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 59-77.
Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (2015). Innovation in organizations: The case for a multilevel perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 1-18.
Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Dvir, T. (2008). CEO values, organizational culture, and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 825-847.
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895.
Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing for innovation. Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, 413-430.
Edmondson, A. C. (2008). The competitive imperative of learning. Harvard Business Review, 86(7), 60-67.
Garcia-Perez, A. (2019). The role of communication in fostering innovation in startups. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20(1), 57-67.
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of virtuality on team processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 449-465.
Hargie, O. (2011). The handbook of communication skills (4th ed.). Routledge.
Kaufman, A., & Taras, D. (2015). Organizational communication and innovation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43(3), 228-245.
Kumar, R., & Puranam, P. (2012). Innovation in startups: The role of communication technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 61-78.
Lee, S. M., Trimi, S., & Kim, C. (2018). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the age of globalization. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(4), 234-252.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30.
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259-271.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.