A Conceptual Model for Sustainability in Barter Business Models: Goods and Services Barter in the C2C Domain: A Meta-Synthesis Approach

Authors

    Sara Beikmohammadi PhD Student in Marketing Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Iran
    Ayoub Mohammadian * Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran mohamadian@ut.ac.ir
    Jalil Heidary Dahooie Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, IranĀ 

Keywords:

sustainability, barter, based businesses, C2C goods and services, meta, synthesis

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the aim of presenting a conceptual model for sustainability in barter business models, specifically goods and services barter in the consumer-to-consumer (C2C) domain, using a meta-synthesis approach. In terms of purpose, the study is exploratory, and in terms of approach, it is qualitative. The research method employed is meta-synthesis, which is used to integrate, analyze, and interpret the findings of previous studies. The research data were collected through a systematic review of valid scientific articles in the fields of barter and sustainability. Subsequently, using thematic analysis, the sustainability components of barter-based businesses were extracted and categorized. Finally, based on the results, a conceptual model of sustainability for barter-based businesses was developed. The results of data analysis indicate that various elements have been introduced in the scientific literature as sustainability components of barter-based businesses. In the present study, these components were extracted through a systematic review approach by examining scientific studies published between 2010 and 2026. The results show that components such as reducing the need for liquidity, reducing capital pressure, improving non-monetary cash flow, economic resilience under crisis conditions, optimal use of surplus inventory, reducing the risk of inventory accumulation, and reducing operational costs are discussed in the economic domain. In addition, factors such as extending product life, recirculation of goods, reducing waste and losses, reducing the environmental impacts of the supply chain, reducing pollutant emissions, and promoting environmental awareness have been discussed in relation to the environment and environmental issues. The results also indicate that components such as participation and voluntary cooperation, reducing social inequality, equitable access to goods and services, and critical consumer awareness in the institutional domain, as well as components such as the institutional legitimacy of barter-based businesses, social acceptance of barter, an organizational culture supportive of barter, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the domain of technology and infrastructure, have been identified in the scientific literature as sustainability components of barter-based businesses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Feil AA, Schreiber D. Sustainability and sustainable development: Unveiling the overlaps and scope of their meanings. Cadernos EBAPEBR. 2017;15(3):667-81. doi: 10.1590/1679-395157516.

2. Geissdoerfer M, Vladimirova D, Evans S. Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;198:401-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240.

3. Seyfang G. Bartering for a better future? Community currencies and sustainable consumption. 2004.

4. Commander S, Dolinskaya I, Mumssen C. Determinants of barter in Russia: An empirical analysis. Journal of Development Economics. 2002;67(2):275-307.

5. Guriev S, Kvassov D. Barter for price discrimination. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2004;22(3):329-50.

6. Xu N, editor Barter system as an innovative and alternative financial and trade model during the periods of economic crisis and recession and its importance for businesses. Press Academia Proceedings; 2004.

7. Oliver P, Mpinganjira M. An empirical investigation into difficulties associated with barter trading. African Journal of Business Management. 2011;5(4).

8. Battistella C, Hynes N. Something new under the sun? A case study of modern Italian barter systems. Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 2019;21(2):27-45.

9. Huang Y, Pi Z, Fang W. Trade credit with barter in a capital-constrained supply chain. Sustainability. 2021;13(20):11361. doi: 10.3390/su132011361.

10. Hua G, Zhang Y, Cheng TCE, Wang S, Zhang J. The newsvendor problem with barter exchange. Omega. 2020;92:102149.

11. Bieniek M. Bartering: Price-setting newsvendor problem with barter exchange. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6684. doi: 10.3390/su13126684.

12. Lo CW, Wong JJ, editors. Barter: A dimension of sustainable design. IASDR Conference Proceedings; 2015.

13. Challenger M, Tezel BT, Alaca OF, Tekinerdogan B, Kardas G. Development of semantic web-enabled BDI multi-agent systems using SEA_ML: An electronic bartering case study. Applied Sciences. 2018;8(5):688.

14. Anderson R, Ashlagi I, Gamarnik D, Kanoria Y. Efficient dynamic barter exchange. Operations Research. 2017;65(6):1446-59. doi: 10.1287/opre.2017.1644.

15. Molina-Jimenez C, Nakib HDA, Song L, Sfyrakis I, Crowcroft J. A case for a currencyless economy based on bartering with smart contracts. arXiv. 2020.

16. Shuhaiber A, Ali Alfayadhi HS, AlAwlaqi MM, Awadh Ali MA. E-Barter exchanging system: Toward a smart and sustainable community. In: Nagar AK, Singh Jat D, Mishra DK, Joshi A, editors. Intelligent Sustainable Systems. 578. Singapore: Springer; 2023.

17. Maria RR. Digital barter system: Facilitating sustainable consumption through web-based platform for goods exchange 2024.

18. Sanchez-Casanova WM. Barter in the path of a citizen-consumer: An autoethnographic viewpoint. Revista Politica, Globalidad y Ciudadania. 2022;8(16).

19. Arellanes-Cancino Y, Villafan-Vidales KB, Medina-Nava M, Vargas-Herrejon M. Social impacts of Purepecha barter: Insights for sustainable communities in the global era. Societal Impacts. 2025;6:100136. doi: 10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100136.

20. Borges MH, Bom AC, Mattoso CCLQ. Barter as a way to achieve a sustainability strategy in the pharmaceutical industry. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental. 2020;14(3):75-92. doi: 10.24857/rgsa.v14i3.2520.

21. Thakur V, Mangla SK. Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;213:847-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.201.

22. Wang S, Yin C, Yang X, Richel A. Barter mode: The institutional innovation for affordable and clean energy (SDG7) in rural China. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2023;170:106725. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106725.

23. Mishra AK, Valera HGA, Yamano T, Pede VO. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, fertilizer prices, and food security: Evidence from rice-producing economies in Asia. SSRN. 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4795295.

24. Espinoza EU. Rising power status and the evolution of international order: Conceptualising Russia's Syria policies. Europe-Asia Studies. 2019;71(3):365-87. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2019.1575955.

25. Nunez R, Bhattacharya S, Sarkar B, Gunasekaran A. Pricing strategy based on a stochastic problem with barter exchange under variable promotional effort for a retail channel. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2005;81:103954. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103954.

Downloads

Published

2027-05-01

Submitted

2024-04-19

Revised

2024-07-20

Accepted

2024-07-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Beikmohammadi, S., Mohammadian, A., & Heidary Dahooie, J. (2027). A Conceptual Model for Sustainability in Barter Business Models: Goods and Services Barter in the C2C Domain: A Meta-Synthesis Approach. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-15. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/380

Similar Articles

41-50 of 174

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.