Providing a Model for Accountants’ Psychological Contract and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Report Financial Misconduct

Authors

    Fatemeh Sanaeirahmati Department of Accounting, No.c,Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran
    Javad Ramezani * Associate professor, Department of Accounting, No.c,Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran javad.ramezani58@iau.ac.ir
    Seyed Javad Ebrahimian Assistant professor, Department of Accounting, No.c,Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran

Keywords:

Accountants’ psychological contract, organizational obligations, interactional structures, ethical requirements, willingness to report financial misconduct

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the psychological contract on accountants’ willingness to report financial misconduct. In terms of methodology, the study is exploratory and, from an analytical perspective, is considered a mixed-methods research. Due to the lack of a coherent framework regarding accountants’ psychological contract, thematic analysis was employed to identify study themes through a review of prior research and interviews with experts. Subsequently, the Delphi method was used to analyze the reliability of the identified dimensions, and finally, in the quantitative phase, the research hypothesis was tested using structural equation modeling and Smart PLS3 software. Data related to the accountants’ psychological contract were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire, while a standardized questionnaire was used to measure willingness to report financial misconduct. This mixed approach systematically examined the relationship between metacognitive beliefs and professional judgment. The qualitative findings revealed four overarching themes (accountants’ perceptual framework of organizational obligations, interactional structures between accountants and the organization, ethical and professional requirements in the workplace, and support frameworks for accountants), twelve organizing themes (accountants’ perceptions of job security and stability, psychological and emotional support, professional growth and skill development, work–life balance, transparency in organizational communication, fairness in the distribution of resources and opportunities, respect for ethical values, organizational commitment to financial obligations, mutual trust between accountants and the organization, and accountants’ expectations regarding attention to individual needs, a positive work environment, and supportive programs for mental well-being), and thirty-six basic themes. Subsequently, to assess the reliability of the identified organizing themes and to conceptualize them within the context of accountants’ psychological contract, the Delphi method was applied. Based on the evaluation of the mean scores from the first and second Delphi rounds, all dimensions were confirmed. Furthermore, the results of the research hypothesis indicated that accountants’ psychological contract has a positive and significant effect on their willingness to report financial misconduct. The findings of this study indicate that strengthening accountants’ psychological contract can increase their willingness to report financial misconduct, which in turn contributes to improving financial transparency and public trust. From a policy perspective, these findings emphasize the necessity of creating supportive work environments, developing protective policies for whistleblowers, and strengthening an organizational culture based on ethics and justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Shawver TJ, Shawver TA. The impact of moral reasoning on whistleblowing intentions. Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018.

2. Valentine S, Godkin L. Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention. Journal of Business Research. 2019;98:277-88.

3. Wicaksono A. Whistle-blowing Intention: The Effects of Moral Intensity, Organizational and Professional Commitment. Jurnal Akuntansi. 2018;22(10):114-36.

4. Tang PM, Yam KC, Koopman J. Feeling proud but guilty? Unpacking the paradoxical nature of unethical proorganizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2020;160:68-86. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.004.

5. Wahyuni L, Chariri A, Yuyetta EA. Whistleblowing intention: Theory of planned behavior perspectives. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2021;8(1):335-41.

6. Jehanzeb K. Does perceived organizational support and employee development influence organizational citizenship behavior?: Person–organization fit as moderator. European Journal of Training and Development. 2020;44(6-7):637-57. doi: 10.1108/EJTD-02-2020-0032.

7. Amer M. Predictors of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. 2021;56(2):568-80. doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.2.46.

8. Daryaei M, Nikoumaram H, Khanmohammadi MH. The impact of organizational culture on reporting organizational wrongdoing in the auditing profession. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research. 2020;12(46):27-50.

9. Alizadehgan L, Samadi Lorgani M, Imeni M. The impact of personality type and professional ethics on auditors' ability to detect fraud using the theory of planned behavior with the role of professional skepticism. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research. 2022;14(54):49-78.

10. Heydari G, Nikoumaram H, Vakilifard HR. The relationship between the characteristics of the dark triad of personality and the tendency towards fraudulent behaviors: A test of social trust theory. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge. 2023;10(1):12-27.

11. Siadati ZS, Sepasi S. Determining the factors affecting resilience in auditing using the Shannon entropy technique. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge. 2024;13(51):217-32.

12. Overchuk V, Liashch O, Yatsiuk M, Ihnatovych O, Maliar O. Provision of the individual’s psychological security: The possibility of formation and correction. 2022.

13. Wang RJ, Lent RW. The Role of Self-Efficacy in Coping With the Psychological Challenges of Job Loss: Application of the Social Cognitive Career Self-Management Model. Journal of Career Assessment. 2024. doi: 10.1177/10690727241239946.

14. Gibbs Z. Linking Nurses' Job Embeddedness and Self-Efficacy to Locus of Control. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2022;27(3).

15. Berradia HM. The impact of professional development factors on accountants' professional competence and job performance in Saudi Arabia. Global Business & Finance Review. 2025;30(5):116.

16. Karimi F, Pakmaram A, Shahvalizadeh A, Babaei G. Designing a professional identity model for accountants in government organizations. Advances in Accounting. 2025;12(1):1-18.

17. Namazi M, Ebrahimi F, Sarikhani M. Effects of anticipatory socialization, professional commitment, and moral intensity on whistleblowing intentions by accounting students: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2023;15(5):1717-35.

18. Prabowo MA, Putri BADU, Hanifah MN. Implementation of Javanese Cultural Values in the Professional Ethics of Public Accountants in Public Services. Innovation Business Management and Accounting Journal. 2025;4(3):84-90.

19. Clyde V, Hanifah IA, Muchlish M. Professionalism and Locus of Control on Whistleblowing Intention: The Moderating Role of Organizational Commitment. AFRE Accounting and Financial Review. 2022;5(1):31-40.

20. Pehlivanoglu M, Köse E. The Effect of Organizational Identification on Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Research - Turk. 2020;12:2151-60.

21. Wijayanti DM, Senjani YP, Farah W. The role of Machiavellian personality, altruistic personality, religiosity, whistleblowing system, and accounting firm size in mitigating fraud intention. Journal of Financial Crime. 2024;31(1):119-34.

22. Mulyanti R, Saepudin TH, Aviyanti C. Model of Leadership Style, Self-Efficacy, on Performance and Work Engagement as an Intervening Variable: A Literature Review. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science. 2023;5(1):142-58.

23. Dwyer LP. Leadership self-efficacy: review and leader development implications. Journal of Management Development. 2019;38(8):637-50.

24. Nejad Toloumi B, Rahnama Roodposhti F, Nikoumaram H, Vakilifard HR. Investigating the willingness to blow the whistle on accounting fraud among private and public sector accountants based on procedural, interactive, and distributive justice. Financial Accounting Knowledge. 2019;6(4):47-75.

25. Yaseen R, Al-Hussein R. Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Commitment among Nurses. 2020;10(3):86-101.

26. Arifianto J, Sudibijo YA. Whistleblowing, Morality, Good Corporate Governance, The Role of Accountant as A Moderation Variable to Fraud Intention. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 2024;56:139-55.

27. Branicki L, Brammer S, Linnenluecke M, Houghton D. Accounting for resilience: the role of the accounting professions in promoting resilience. Accounting and Business Research. 2023;53(5):508-36.

28. Hosseini SM. Modeling the social status of certified public accountants in the role of judicial experts based on social identity theory: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge. 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Submitted

2025-12-19

Revised

2026-04-10

Accepted

2026-05-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sanaeirahmati, F., Ramezani, J., & Ebrahimian, S. J. (2026). Providing a Model for Accountants’ Psychological Contract and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Report Financial Misconduct. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-18. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/266

Similar Articles

11-20 of 167

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.