Prioritizing the Factors Affecting the Imposition of Capital Gains Tax on Shares in the Stock Exchange

Authors

    Sama Nikvash Ph.D. student, Department of Financial Management, Ct.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Ali Akbar Arabmazar * Professor, Department of Economics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran a-arabmazar@sbu.ac.ir
    Farhad Hanifi Department of Financial Management , Ct.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Ali Rahmani Professor, Department of Accounting, Al-Zahra University (S), Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Capital gains tax, Stock exchange, Feasibility analysis, Multi-criteria decision making, DEMATEL, ANP

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify, analyze, and prioritize the key factors influencing the feasibility of imposing a capital gains tax on shares in the stock exchange. This study adopts an applied, descriptive–analytical research design using a multi-criteria decision-making framework. Data were collected through a combination of library-based studies, expert interviews, and structured questionnaires. The study population consisted of taxation and stock market experts selected through purposive judgmental sampling. After identifying relevant criteria and sub-criteria through theoretical review and expert consultation, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was used to determine causal relationships among the main criteria. Subsequently, the Analytical Network Process (ANP) was employed to assign relative weights and priorities to the criteria and sub-criteria while accounting for interdependencies and feedback effects. Reliability and validity of expert judgments were assessed through consistency and content validity checks using specialized decision-making software. The inferential results indicate that government-related considerations exert the strongest causal influence on the feasibility of imposing a capital gains tax on shares, followed by legal and informational factors. Environmental factors play a moderate role, while technological and human factors are largely effect-oriented and dependent. At the sub-criterion level, economic balance and government revenue generation rank as the most influential factors, followed by the existence and transparency of laws and the control of speculative profit opportunities. Factors related to technology, system capabilities, and human resources receive comparatively lower priority weights, indicating their supportive rather than driving role in the feasibility assessment. The findings demonstrate that the feasibility of imposing capital gains tax on shares is primarily determined by macro-fiscal objectives and institutional readiness, supported by legal clarity and regulatory coherence, with environmental and operational factors playing secondary roles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Omodero CO. Nexus Between Fiscal Policy Mechanism and Stock Market Output in a Growing Economy. Journal of Legal Studies. 2023;32(46):27-44. doi: 10.2478/jles-2023-0009.

2. Martinez AL, Silva Rd, Neto AS. Market Concentration and Implicit Taxes: Analyzing Brazilian Firms. Rausp Management Journal. 2024;59(4):402-17. doi: 10.1108/rausp-04-2023-0055.

3. Menike LMCS. The Impact of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Changes on Investors' Investment Performance: Empirical Evidence From Investors in the Colombo Stock Exchange in Sri Lanka. Sabaragamuwa University Journal. 2020;18(1):16-29. doi: 10.4038/suslj.v18i1.7751.

4. Sun R. Research on the Influence of Monetary Policy on Stock Market Return. Frontiers in Business Economics and Management. 2023;10(2):320-3. doi: 10.54097/fbem.v10i2.11063.

5. Hussain S, Ali R, Emam W, Tashkandy Y, Mishra P, Fahlevi M, et al. Economic Policy Uncertainty and Firm Value: Impact of Investment Sentiments in Energy and Petroleum. Sustainability. 2023;15(12):9656. doi: 10.3390/su15129656.

6. Zhang L, Chen W, Hu N. Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Liquidity: Evidence From China. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2021;18(1):22-44. doi: 10.1108/ijoem-06-2020-0625.

7. Mugendi J. Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Market Volatility in Kenya. American Journal of Finance. 2024;10(1):59-71. doi: 10.47672/ajf.1812.

8. Humaira A, Susanto H. The Effect of Cash Holding Policy, Dividend Policy and Profitability on Stock Prices. Journal of Accounting Entrepreneurship and Financial Technology (Jaef). 2020;1(2):135-48. doi: 10.37715/jaef.v1i2.1278.

9. Akib M, Nurdin E, Purnaman SMN, Anwar F. Does Capital Structure, Profitability, and Dividend Policy Improve Stock Prices? International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023;8(6):e02395. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2395.

10. AlAli MS, AlQamlas TN, AlHajri SR, AlBasri NS, AlSalem AS. Profitability, Dividend Policy and Stock Prices. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486). 2024;13(1):17-21. doi: 10.20525/ijfbs.v13i1.3293.

11. Ali M, Saeed M, Khalid MA. The Role of Dividend Policy on Stock Price Volatility: An Analysis and Evidence From Pakistan. Research Journal for Societal Issues. 2023;5(2):157-70. doi: 10.56976/rjsi.v5i2.106.

12. Bai M, Qin Y, Bai F. Dividend Policy and Firm Liquidity Under the Tax Imputation System in Australia. International Journal of Managerial Finance. 2023;20(2):281-303. doi: 10.1108/ijmf-01-2023-0018.

13. Kirom MS, Nur DI. Stock Returns Analysis With Dividend Policy as an Intervening Variable in IDX30 Index Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Economics Finance and Management Studies. 2023;06(11). doi: 10.47191/jefms/v6-i11-50.

14. Wafula SN, Miroga J. Dividend Policy and Share Price Volatility of Listed Construction Firms at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. International Journal of Research and Review. 2024;11(10):325-40. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20241030.

15. Emamian A, Mazlan NS. Monetary-Fiscal Policies and Stock Market Performance: Evidence From Linear ARDL Framework. Gatr Journal of Business and Economics Review. 2021;5(4):69-80. doi: 10.35609/jber.2021.5.4(7).

16. Gbadebo AD. Exchange Rate Volatility and Nigerian Stock Market Development. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023;8(9):e03078. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i9.3078.

17. Lau WY, Yip T-M. The Effect of Different Periods of Unconventional Monetary Policies on Japanese Financial Markets. Journal of Financial Economic Policy. 2023;15(3):263-79. doi: 10.1108/jfep-11-2022-0275.

18. Aswata MA, Affandi RA. The U.S. Quantitative Easing Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Influence on the Growing Number of Indonesian Retail Investors. E3s Web of Conferences. 2023;426:02136. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202342602136.

19. Sreenu N, Pradhan AK. The Effect of COVID-19 on Indian Stock Market Volatility: Can Economic Package Control the Uncertainty? Journal of Facilities Management. 2022;21(5):798-815. doi: 10.1108/jfm-12-2021-0162.

20. Tarmidi D, Alfia YD, Umar H. Analyzing Owner’s Role in Influencing Corporate Tax Policy. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters. 2022;10(4):428-39. doi: 10.18488/73.v10i4.3107.

21. Guedrib M, Hamdi Z. Investigating tax risk's influence on tax avoidance and debt costs: evidence from France. Journal of Financial Crime. 2025;32(2):321-36. doi: 10.1108/JFC-03-2024-0111.

22. Christabella C, Puspita AF. Are the Beneish model and restatement relevant in detecting tax evasion? Journal of Accounting and Investment. 2025;26(1):360-78. doi: 10.18196/jai.v26i1.26851.

23. Ofori E, Appiah MO. Multinational tax evasion and money laundering: examining the financial investigation system in Ghana. Journal of Money Laundering Control. 2025;28(2):442-62. doi: 10.1108/JMLC-09-2024-0150.

24. Gbanador MA. An Empirical Test for Semi-Strong Form Efficient Market Hypothesis of the Nigeria Stock Market. Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting. 2021:42-53. doi: 10.9734/ajeba/2021/v21i2330532.

25. Imhanzenobe JO. Historical Development of Frontier Stock Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023;8(7):e02659. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i7.2659.

26. Komariah SH, Gusni G, Riantani S. Determinants of the Equity Price of Main Board Index Companies. Jurnal Ilmu Keuangan Dan Perbankan (Jika). 2024;13(2):355-66. doi: 10.34010/jika.v13i2.12881.

27. Maskey S. Specific Determinants of Share Prices: A Case Study of Listed Life Insurance Companies in Nepal Stock Exchange. Journal of Business and Management Research. 2022;4(01):49-60. doi: 10.3126/jbmr.v4i01.46682.

28. Oluoch OS. Analysis of the Mediating Effect of Macroeconomic Factors on the Relationship Between Dividend Policy and Stock Return in Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. The International Journal of Business & Management. 2024. doi: 10.24940/theijbm/2023/v11/i11/bm2311-011.

29. Asiedu BA. The Combine Impact of Stock Market, International Investment and Clean Energy Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Emerging Countries. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2024;18(6):2389-407. doi: 10.1108/ijesm-12-2023-0027.

30. Karginova-Gubinova V. Impact of Companies’ Statements About Their Environmental Actions on Stock Prices. Mir (Modernization Innovation Research). 2022;13(3):369-84. doi: 10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.3.369-384.

31. Efuntade OO, Olusegun FA. Assessing Literatures on the Dependence of Stock Market Development on Upstream Oil Royalty Revenue and Systematic Risk Factors: Highlighting the Relevance of Dutch Disease Theory and Capital Asset Pricing Model. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research. 2022;8(3):1-30. doi: 10.56201/ijssmr.v8.no3.2022.pg1.30.

32. Kam WT. The Impact of the Dividend Policy on the Price Volatilization of Common Stock–Evidence From the Stock Market of Hong Kong. 2022. doi: 10.20944/preprints202202.0362.v1.

33. Hariyanto D, Brahmana RK, Wendy W. Sectoral Herding During Global Rare Events: Evidence From the Indonesian Capital Market. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis. 2024;15(1):99-116. doi: 10.18196/mb.v15i1.21601.

34. Fauziah L, Venusita L. The Reaction of Capital Markets in Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand Towards the Announcement of Lockdown Policy During the Beginning of the Covid-19. Journal of Accounting Entrepreneurship and Financial Technology (Jaef). 2021;2(2):109-32. doi: 10.37715/jaef.v2i2.1831.

35. Zhang Y. Effectiveness of Dividend Policy on Investment Information Delivery. Accounting and Corporate Management. 2024;6(1). doi: 10.23977/acccm.2024.060117.

36. Moizz A, Akhtar S. Dynamic Linkages Between the Monetary Policy Variables and Stock Market in the Presence of Structural Breaks: Evidence From India. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking. 2024;8(3):391-411. doi: 10.1108/ajeb-01-2024-0005.

37. Roche CJ, Olweny T, Nasieku T. Fundamental Anomalies and Firms Financial Distress; Evidence From Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. 2020:1-27. doi: 10.47260/jafb/1121.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-20

Submitted

2026-11-10

Revised

2026-02-12

Accepted

2026-02-19

How to Cite

Nikvash, S. ., Arabmazar, A. A., Hanifi, F. ., & Rahmani, A. . (2025). Prioritizing the Factors Affecting the Imposition of Capital Gains Tax on Shares in the Stock Exchange. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 3(1), 1-12. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/209

Similar Articles

61-70 of 144

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.