Examining the Threshold Effects of Corporate Governance in the Relationship between Investment Cash Flow Dynamics, Financial and Business Cycles of Listed Companies, and Earnings Quality

Authors

    Shabnam Raeisi Department of Economics, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Khashayar Seyedshokri * Department of Economics, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran kh.seyedshokri@iau.ac.ir
    Shahriar Nessabian Department of Economics, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Reza Rahimi Department of Economics, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Corporate governance, Earnings Quality, investment cash flow dynamics, financial cycles, business cycles

Abstract

The present study aims to examine the threshold effects of corporate governance in the relationship between investment cash flow dynamics, financial and business cycles of listed companies, and earnings quality. From the perspective of its objective, the study is applied in nature, and in terms of methodology, it follows a descriptive–analytical approach. The analysis is conducted using panel data from listed companies over the period 2011 to 2024. After applying screening criteria, a total of 106 companies were selected as the final sample and subjected to empirical analysis. Earnings quality is measured using discretionary accruals, while investment cash flow dynamics and financial and business cycles are assessed using standard indicators widely employed in the financial literature. In addition, a composite corporate governance index is constructed based on nine components, including board size and independence, gender diversity, board tenure, the existence of specialized committees, executive compensation, and institutional ownership. These components are reduced to a single index using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. Prior to model estimation, the stationarity of variables is examined using the Levin–Lin–Chu unit root test, the results of which indicate that all variables are stationary at levels. Furthermore, the Kao panel cointegration test confirms the existence of a long-run equilibrium relationship among the study variables. To investigate nonlinear and threshold relationships, the Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) model is employed. The results of linearity diagnostic tests reveal that the relationships among the variables are nonlinear in nature, and that a logistic transition function with a single threshold is sufficient to capture this behavior. The findings from the PSTR model estimation indicate that investment cash flow dynamics and financial cycles have a positive and statistically significant effect on earnings quality, whereas firms’ business cycles exert a negative and significant impact on earnings quality. Moreover, corporate governance, as the transition variable, plays a reinforcing role in this relationship, such that once the corporate governance index exceeds the estimated threshold level, the magnitude of the explanatory variables’ effects on earnings quality increases significantly. These results suggest that improving corporate governance structures through enhanced transparency, reduced agency problems, and strengthened monitoring mechanisms can facilitate more efficient management of investment cash flows and better alignment of financial and business cycles, ultimately leading to improved earnings quality. By extending the literature on nonlinear relationships in corporate finance, the findings of this study provide valuable implications for managers, investors, and policymakers in promoting more efficient decision-making and enhancing the sustainability of corporate performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sebri M, Ajide FM, Dachraoui H. Geopolitical risk threshold in the informal economy-natural resources nexus: evidence from BRICS economies. Mineral Economics. 2025:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s13563-025-00514-w.

2. Siddiki J, Bala-Keffi LR. Revisiting the relation between financial inclusion and economic growth: a global analysis using panel threshold regression. Economic Modelling. 2024;135:106707. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106707.

3. Zhang H, Zhao L. Capital flow dynamics and financial stability in emerging markets: Evidence from China and India. Journal of Asian Economics. 2023;88:101491-.

4. Proaño CR, Virla LQ, Strohsal T. How strong is the link between the global financial cycle and national macro-financial dynamics? A wavelet analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2025;159:103419-. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103419.

5. Mahboudi R, Dareh-Nazari Z. The Threshold Effects of Fintech on Financial Development in Iran. Research on Planning and Development. 2023:35-56.

6. Fazeli Chahar Mahali K. Investigating the Impact of Earnings Quality and Institutional Investor Performance on Cash Holdings. 2024.

7. Sadeqi Sharif SJ, Irani Janiarloo S. The Role of Working Capital Management in Explaining the Profitability of Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Perspectives on Financial Management. 2023;7(19):9-26.

8. Zafari S. The Impact of Excess Cash on Capital Expenditures with Emphasis on Financial Constraints. Journal of the Stock Exchange. 2023;9(35):103-23.

9. Nguyen DK, Paltalidis N. Credit and financial cycle synchronization impact on sovereign credit risk. Finance Research Letters. 2025;86(Part A):108236-. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108236.

10. Petz N, Zörner TO. How Phillips curve dynamics enhance business cycle synchronization analysis in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2026;161:103495-. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2026.103495.

11. Alsamara M, Mrabet Z, Mimouni K. The threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in MENA countries: Do energy endowments matter? International Review of Economics & Finance. 2024;89(B):458–70. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.015.

12. Jusaj Y, Avdimetaj K, Zogaj V, Gara A. The Impact of Public Debt Threshold on Economic Growth Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Analysis of Central and Eastern European Developing Countries. Economics and Culture. 2025;22(1). doi: 10.2478/jec-2025-0010.

13. Miao W, Ma Y, Xu H. Capital regulation, regulatory avoidance, and bank systemic risk. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;100:104002-. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104002.

14. Sataei MH, Momtazian A, Behpour S. Investigating the Non-Linear Relationship Between Growth and Profitability in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Asset Management and Financial Supply. 2023;3(4):51-66.

15. Narayan S, Kumar D. Macroprudential policy and systemic risk in G20 nations. Journal of Financial Stability. 2024;75:101340-. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101340.

16. Ren ST, Wei W, Zhang JW, Yang SH. Macroprudential policy, financial risk and innovation: Cross country evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2025;91:102749-. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102749.

17. Mandia AN. Stop-Loss Reinsurance Threshold for Dependent Risks. Journal of Mathematical Finance. 2023;13(03):304-20. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2023.133019.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2026-11-10

Revised

2026-02-12

Accepted

2026-02-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Raeisi, . S. ., Seyedshokri, K., Nessabian, S. ., & Rahimi, R. . (2026). Examining the Threshold Effects of Corporate Governance in the Relationship between Investment Cash Flow Dynamics, Financial and Business Cycles of Listed Companies, and Earnings Quality. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-17. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/199

Similar Articles

61-70 of 111

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.