Examining the Impact of Government Expenditure Shocks and Islamic Participation Bonds on the Financial Cycle of Business Cycles during Recession and Expansion in Iran

Authors

    Mohammad Vaziri Department of Economics, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Bijan Safavi * Department of Economics, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran bijan.safavi@iau.ac.ir
    Fatemeh Zandi Department of Economics, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Hamidreza Alipour Shirsavar Department of Economics, Ra.C., Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

Keywords:

Government expenditure, financial cycle, Islamic participation bonds, expenditure shocks, business cycle

Abstract

The present study examines the impact of government expenditure shocks and Islamic participation bonds on the financial cycle of business cycles during periods of recession and expansion in Iran. From the perspective of research objectives, this study is applied, and in terms of its nature, it is descriptive–analytical. It falls within the category of ex post facto research and relies on historical data covering the period from 1987 to 2024. Based on the results of estimating the Markov-switching model, most coefficients are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, and their signs are consistent with theoretical foundations. The intercept is 0.32 in the first regime and −0.58 in the second regime. According to Hamilton (1988), a regime with a negative intercept represents a recessionary regime, while a regime with a positive intercept indicates an expansionary regime. Accordingly, in this study, the first regime represents the expansion period, and the second regime represents the recession period. The variance of the disturbance terms is 0.09 in the first regime and 0.43 in the second regime. These values indicate that the first regime (the expansion period) exhibits lower volatility compared to the second regime (the recession period) in the present study. An examination of the Markov model estimation results reported in the table above shows that negative shocks to current and capital government expenditures, consumption, and inflation exert negative effects on the financial cycle in both expansionary and recessionary periods. Shocks to current and capital government expenditures in the first regime (the expansion period) lead to a reduction in the ratio of liquidity to gross domestic product, whereas in the second regime (the recession period), this effect is positive. The production variable also has a negative effect on the ratio of liquidity to gross domestic product in both regimes (recession and expansion). In Iran, due to the fact that financial markets are generally limited and imperfect, investment depends on the ability to secure financing from domestic savings. Consequently, an increase in the rate of return on bonds enhances the feasibility of financing projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ilzetzki E, Mendoza EG, Vegh CA. How Big (Small?) Are Fiscal Multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics. 2013;60(2):239-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011.

2. Clark M, Davis S. Fiscal Policy Shocks and Their Impact on Financial Cycles. International Review of Economics. 2022;57(3):210-30.

3. Anderson J, Brown L. Asymmetric Effects of Government Spending Shocks on Business Cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics. 2023;48(2):150-70.

4. Radu ȘC. The effects of government expenditure on the output: A real business cycle analysis for the Romanian economy. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica. 2023;68(2):55-72. doi: 10.2478/subboec-2023-0009.

5. Fernández-Villaverde J, Guerrón-Quintana PA. Uncertainty shocks and business cycle research. Review of Economic Dynamics. 2020;37:S118-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2020.06.005.

6. Houshmandi H. Asymmetric Cointegration Based on Nonlinear ARDL: Evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange. Quarterly Journal of Investment Knowledge. 2024;13(52).

7. Giannellis N, Tzanaki MA. Macroeconomic responses to financial stress shocks: Evidence from the US and the Eurozone. International Economics. 2025;181:100573. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100573.

8. Choudhury MA, Hoque ME. Fiscal shocks and growth cycles: The moderating role of Islamic banking. Journal of Financial Stability. 2021;53:100783.

9. Jilani H, Ahmed S. Why Islamic banking is taking off. Financial Times. 2025.

10. Fadzil IHM, Afiq MK, Azmi KMA. Impact of global economic changes on sukuk markets. ResearchGate. 2024.

11. Moshiri S, Kheirandish E. Global impacts of oil price shocks: the trade effect. Journal of Economic Studies. 2024;51(1):126-44. doi: 10.1108/JES-08-2022-0455.

12. Shafique M, Ahmad R. The asymmetric impact of fiscal shocks on output: Evidence from Islamic economies. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2021;113:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102350.

13. Laamire S, Zirari A. Macroeconomic Impacts of Fiscal Shocks on the Moroccan Economy: A Disaggregated SVAR Analysis. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development. 2021. doi: 10.1108/JBSED-08-2021-0112.

14. Shahbaz M, Sheikh UA, Tabash MI, Jiao Z. Shock transmission between climate policy uncertainty, financial stress indicators, oil price uncertainty and industrial metal volatility: Identifying moderators, hedgers and shock transmitters. Energy Economics. 2024;136:107732. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107732.

15. Metiu N, Prieto E, Rapach D, Zhou G. Time-Varying Stock Return Correlation, News Shocks, and Business Cycles Time-series and cross-sectional stock return forecasting: new machine learning methods. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, 2023.

16. Haque ME, Imam MO. Following the crowd: Unveiling the impact of macroeconomic shocks and monetary policy shifts on herding dynamics in the commodity and metals sectors. Economies. 2025;13(11):306.

17. Riblier V. The fiscal cost of public debt and government spending shocks. arXiv. 2023.

18. Mohammadi Nezhād Pāshāki MB, Eqbāl Nīā M, Sādeghī Sharīf J. Investigation and Analysis of the Effect of Economic Sanctions on Shock Spillover to the Stock, Foreign Exchange, and Gold Coin Markets. Finance and Banking. 2024. doi: 10.22054/fiba.2024.74765.1002.

19. Mohammadi T, Fooladvand A, Amin-Rashti N. Testing the Asymmetric Effects of Tax Burden and Production on Iran's Tax Evasion Using the Nonlinear NARDL Model. Quarterly Journal of Financial Economics. 2024;18(69):110-35.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2026-11-10

Revised

2026-02-12

Accepted

2026-02-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Vaziri, M. ., Safavi, B., Zandi, F. ., & Alipour Shirsavar, H. . (2026). Examining the Impact of Government Expenditure Shocks and Islamic Participation Bonds on the Financial Cycle of Business Cycles during Recession and Expansion in Iran. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-17. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/198

Similar Articles

81-90 of 123

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.