Managing the Challenges of Organic Agriculture Development in Rural Areas: An Analysis of Barriers and the Provision of Commercial Strategies in Mazandaran Province

Authors

    Nooshin Osooli * Department of Agriculture, Khor.C., Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran noshin_osoli@iau.ac.ir

Keywords:

Organic agriculture, rural development, organic farming challenges, Mazandaran Province

Abstract

The development of organic agriculture, as a strategic pathway toward achieving environmental sustainability and food security, despite the high natural potential of Mazandaran Province, has been progressing slowly and is confronted with numerous challenges. The present study was conducted with the objective of managing the challenges of organic agriculture development in rural areas through analyzing existing barriers and proposing commercial strategies in Mazandaran Province. This research adopted a qualitative approach and employed thematic analysis. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 35 key stakeholders (farmers, local officials, agricultural extension experts, cooperative activists, and traders) in rural areas of Mazandaran Province. Participants were selected using purposive sampling combined with the snowball technique until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data analysis was carried out following the thematic analysis procedure of Braun and Clarke (2006). The analysis resulted in the identification of five main themes and fifteen subthemes. The principal challenges included: (1) technical–agronomic challenges (including insufficient knowledge, complex pest management, and the transition period); (2) economic–market challenges (including high production costs, lack of guaranteed purchasing mechanisms, and weaknesses in support systems); (3) institutional–governance challenges (including inter-organizational misalignment, complexity of certification processes, and fragmented regulations); (4) socio-cultural challenges (including resistance to change, generational gaps, and low social trust); and (5) infrastructural–ecological challenges (including fragmented farmlands, contamination of soil and water resources, and deficiencies in the supply chain). These challenges dynamically interact to form a “vicious cycle” that seriously impedes the expansion of organic cultivation. The proposed commercial strategies are grounded in the creation of an integrated business ecosystem centered on establishing financial guarantee institutions (such as guaranteed purchase funds) and facilitative organizations (such as the Provincial Organic Hub), alongside the development of provincial branding and commercial clusters. This approach, by emphasizing the participation of the private sector and cooperatives, reduces producers’ risk while enhancing supply chain transparency and access to high-value markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Farashiani ME, Alinejad M, Zamani SM. The Damaging Effects of Chemical Fertilizers on Nature and Living Organisms. 2021;5(70):61-8.

2. Yunlong C, Smit B. Sustainability in Chinese agriculture challenges and hopes. Ecosystems & Environments. 1994;49(3):279-88. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(94)90057-4.

3. Fibl, Ifoam. The World of Organic Agriculture, statistics and emerging trends2019.

4. Frick BLTLWJ, Martens JT. Organic field crop handbook. Canada: Canadian Organic Growers; 2017.

5. Oelofse M, Jensen HH, Abreu LS, Almeida GF, Hui QY, Sultan T, et al. Certified organic agriculture in China and Brazil: Market accessibility and outcomes following adoption. Ecological Economics. 2010;69(9):1785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.016.

6. Tovar LG, Martin L, Cruz MA, Mutersbaugh T. Certified organic agriculture in Mexico: Market connections and certification practices in large and small producers. Journal of Rural Studies. 2005;21(4):461-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.10.002.

7. Bui HTM, Nguyen HTT. Factors influencing farmers' decision to convert to organic tea cultivation in the mountainous areas of northern Vietnam. Organic Agriculture. 2021;11:51-61. doi: 10.1007/s13165-020-00322-2.

8. Karpisheh L. The Development of Organic Agriculture and its Obstacles from the Perspective of Agricultural Experts. Geography and Human Relationships. 2023;6(3):238-47.

9. Yaghoubi J, Javadi A. Barriers to Organic Product Production from the Perspective of Agricultural Experts. Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Development. 2014;24(1):57-68.

10. Pap Zan A, Shiri N. Barriers and Problems to the Development of Organic Agriculture. Economy of Space and Rural Development. 2012;1(1).

11. Demiyurek K. Analysis of information systems and communication networks for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in the Samsun province of Turkey. Agricultural Systems. 2010;103(7):444-52. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.04.002.

12. Rointer SB, Darnhofer I, Somsook S, Vogl CR. Consumer perceptions of organic foods in Bangkok, Thailand. Food Policy. 2009;33(2):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.09.004.

13. Cao W, Tao X. A Study on the Evolutionary Game of the Four-Party Agricultural Product Supply Chain Based on Collaborative Governance and Sustainability. Sustainability. 2025;17(4):1762. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041762.

14. Rao BR, Batni AR, Shrivastava P. Fostering Agriculture Ecosystem for Sustainability. Digital Agricultural Ecosystem: Revolutionary Advancements in Agriculture2024. p. 211-28.

15. Ven Hvd. Can Digital Activism Change Sustainable Supply Chain Practices in the Agricultural Bioeconomy? Evidence From #Buttergate. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(24):11893. doi: 10.3390/app142411893.

16. Mohammadzade Nasirabadi M, Hasani M, Sharghi T. Analysis of the Components of Organic Agriculture Development from the Perspective of Agricultural Experts in Tehran Province. Iranian Scientific Association of Rural Development, University of Torbat Heydarieh. 2024;11(1):78-95.

17. Kansiime MK, Aliamo C, Alokit C, Rware H, Murungi D, Kamulegeya P, et al. Pathways and Business Models for Sustainable Youth Employment in Agriculture: A Review of Research and Practice in Africa. Cabi Agriculture and Bioscience. 2025. doi: 10.1079/ab.2025.0045.

18. Pour Samani E, Khani, Yazdani B, Davoodi, Seyed Mohammad R. Designing a sustainable supply chain model in the food and agricultural industries with an emphasis on economic, social, and environmental dimensions: Application of interpretive structural modeling method. Supply Chain Management. 2024;26(84):77-102.

19. Zghara I. Legal Ensuring the Sustainable Development of the Agricultural Sector of Ukraine Under the Conditions of European Integration. Public Administration and Regional Development. 2024;25:798-816. doi: 10.34132/pard2024.25.04.

20. Zarei A, Izadi F. Developing Green Human Resource Management with a Gap Analysis Approach (Case Study: Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Fars Province). First National Congress on Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility: Challenges and Solutions. 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

Submitted

2025-10-07

Revised

2025-12-20

Accepted

2025-12-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Osooli, N. (2026). Managing the Challenges of Organic Agriculture Development in Rural Areas: An Analysis of Barriers and the Provision of Commercial Strategies in Mazandaran Province. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-12. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/147

Similar Articles

41-50 of 81

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.