Causal Structure of Institutional Factors Influencing the Digitalization of the Humanitarian Supply Chain: A Thematic Analysis–DEMATEL Approach
Keywords:
Digitalization, humanitarian supply chain, institutional factors, crisis management, thematic analysis, DEMATELAbstract
The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the causal structure of institutional factors influencing the digitalization of the humanitarian supply chain. The research seeks to determine which institutional dimensions function as the primary drivers of digital transformation and which dimensions are more influence-receiving, in order to present a systematic depiction of the institutional mechanisms required to realize digital transformation in relief and rescue operations. In the first phase, to extract institutional factors, an integrative thematic analysis was conducted based on the literature and 12 semi-structured interviews with experts in crisis management and humanitarian relief. The output of this phase was the classification of factors into six main dimensions: public policymaking and governance regulations, leadership and change management, data management and information transparency, inter-organizational coordination and management, infrastructure and cybersecurity, and culture-building and future orientation. In the second phase, to analyze causal relationships and determine the intensity of influence of each dimension, the DEMATEL method was applied using the judgments of seven experts in the fields of digitalization and crisis management. The findings indicate that public policymaking and governance regulations constitute the most influential factor and the primary driver of digitalization. Leadership and change management play an intermediary driving role by transmitting macro-level policies to operational levels. In contrast, dimensions such as data management, inter-organizational coordination, cybersecurity, and culture-building are more influence-receiving, and their strengthening depends on policy and managerial domains. By presenting an institutional–causal framework, the present study demonstrates that the digitalization of the humanitarian supply chain is not merely a technological project, but rather a governance and change management issue. The main added value of this research lies in integrating in-depth qualitative analysis with quantitative causal modeling (DEMATEL) and providing a prioritized roadmap for policymakers and humanitarian managers, enabling them to design the path of digital transformation with a focus on the most critical institutional factors.
Downloads
References
1. Pourezzat AA, Roozbehani K, Taheri Ata G, Saedabadi AA. The Organization as a Phoenix: Reflections on the Life and Death of Social Organizations (Case Study: Jihad-e Sazandegi). Public Administration. 2014;6(3):419-36.
2. Danaee Fard H, Javanalizadeh Azar M. The Methodology of Metaphor in Organization and Management Studies: A Prescriptive Approach. Biannual Journal of Humanities Development. 2023.
3. Khezr H, Khaef-Elahi AA, Delkhah J, Azad Fallah P. Designing a Comprehensive Model for Measuring Organizational Schizophrenia. Public Administration Studies. 2021;4(2):1-33.
4. Kiakojouri D. Analysis of the relationships among Organizational Culture Indicators Using the DEMATEL Method at the Islamic Azad University in the West of Mazandaran Province. Journal of Dynamic Management Business Analysis. 2024;2(4):1-12. doi: 10.61838/dmbaj.2.4.1.
5. Kets de Vries MF, Miller D. Neurotic style and organizational pathology. Strategic Management Journal. 1984;5(1):35-55. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050104.
6. Rajaei Z, Asadzadeh F. The Impact of Organizational Indifference on Organizational Inertia with the Mediating Role of Organizational Silence. Public Management Research. 2021;14(52):277-301.
7. Walsham G. Organizational metaphors and information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems. 1991;1(2):83-94. doi: 10.1057/ejis.1991.16.
8. Cornelissen JP. Metaphor and the Dynamics of Knowledge in Organization Theory: A Case Study of the Organizational Identity Metaphor. Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43(4):683-709. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00607.x.
9. Boardman C, Ponomariov B. Organizational Pathology. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance: Springer, Cham; 2016.
10. Meluso J, Austin-Breneman J, Shaw L. An Agent-Based Model of Miscommunication in Complex System Engineering Organizations. IEEE Systems Journal. 2020;14(3):3463-74. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2940864.
11. Hassani SH, Mousavi H. The Philosophical Foundations of Morgan's Metaphors in Management and the Meta-Theory of Credentials by Allameh Tabatabaei (R.A.). Islam and Management Journal. 2015;7(3):93-111.
12. Shajari M, Asghari Sarem A, Samadi A. Conceptualizing Organizational Stroke (Antecedents, Indicators, and Consequences). Public Administration. 2021;13(1):77-102.
13. Sozanchi H, Javanalizadeh Azar M. Explaining Islam's View of Organization in Light of the Trust Metaphor. Strategic Management Thought. 2017;11(1):5-40.
14. Saborido C, Moreno A, González-Moreno M, Hernández Clemente JC. Organizational malfunctions and the notions of health and disease. Naturalism in the philosophy of health: Issues and implications2016. p. 101-20.
15. Fennimore AK. Munchausen syndrome by proxy: Perpetual organisational illness and therapy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2017;25(1):62-79. doi: 10.1108/IJOA-01-2016-0964.
16. Pasieczny J, Glinka B. Organizational dysfunctions: Sources and areas. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 2016;4(4):213. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2016.040413.
17. Firouzyar S, KiaKojouri D. Identification of Structural Restricting and Driving Factors of Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship (CE): A Case Study. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 2013;2(3):1-16.
18. Sajadi S, Kiakojouri D, Hatami G. The Relationship Between Anxiety and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation with General Health and Psychological Hardiness in Students of Islamic Azad University. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2012;2(3):117-25.
19. Ghaedali H, Mohtadi MM, Nikookar G. The Immortal Organization in Light of the Stem Cell Metaphor. Defense Management and Research Journal. 2022;21(97):131-57.
20. Vulchanova M, Vulchanov V. Rethinking Figurative Language in Autism: What Evidence Can We Use for Interventions? Frontiers in Communication. 2022;7:910850. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.910850.
21. Li F. Critically Unveiling Resistance: Strategies for Effective Change Management in Organizations. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences. 2024;7(3):157-60. doi: 10.54097/y3ycxb90.
22. Asadi A, Kiakajuri D, Varij Kazemi R, Rahmati Kazaz M. The Process of Analyzing Mapping and Metaphor in the Humanities with an Example of the Organizational Autism Metaphor. 2025.
23. Kiakojouri D. Identifying the Dimensions and Components of the Cooperative Structure in Iran with the Approach of Waqf and Charity Affairs Based on Mixed Research. Journal of Endowment & Charity Studies. 2024;2(1):185-202.
24. Sayad Abdi SD, Rezaei Kalidbari H, Goodarzvand Chegini M, Farahbod F. Typology of Organizational Diseases and Their Mutual Effect on Nurses Working in Educational-Therapeutic Centers in Gilan Province. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2022;31(123):244-59.
25. Sepehvand R, Momeni Mofrad M, Saeedi A. Identifying and Prioritizing Factors Affecting Organizational Trauma Using a Fuzzy Delphi Approach. Transformation Management Research Journal. 2020;12(2):251-72.
26. Ranaei Kordshouli H, Nikbakht A, Mostafaei Dolatabad K, Khalilipour H. Assessing the Emergence and Manifestation of Neurotic Organization Characteristics in Organizations: A Study in Education Using a Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach. Public Administration. 2020;12(3):461-93.
27. Tarride MI, Villena B, González J. Organizational diseases. Cybernetics and Systems. 2020;51(6):615-30. doi: 10.1080/01969722.2020.1723873.
28. Sayad Abdi SD, Rezaei Kalidbari H, Goodarzvand Chegini M, Farahbad F. Explaining Customer Satisfaction Based on Organizational Diseases in the Stability Stage with an Organizational Life Cycle Approach. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal. 2024;11(1):25-52.
29. MirTaghian Rudsari M, Kiakojouri D. Students' Attitudes to the Effectiveness of the Factors Affecting the Development of E-Learning (Case Study: Imam Khomeini Marine Science University in Nowshahr). Journal of Teaching in Marine Science. 2016;3(2):51-66.
30. Diyhimpour M, Miandari K, Najjari R, Abedi Jafari H. The Impact of Organizational Transparency on Organizational Trauma Management with the Mediating Role of Social Capital. Journal of Social Capital Management. 2018;5(3):337-63.
31. Saeed BB, Wang W. Organisational Diagnoses: A Survey of the Literature and Proposition of a New Diagnostic Model. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management. 2013;6:222-38. doi: 10.1504/IJISCM.2013.058328.
32. Faghih N, Bavandpour M, Forouharfar A. Biological metaphor and analogy upon organizational management research within the development of clinical organizational pathology. QScience Connect. 2016;2016(4):15. doi: 10.5339/connect.2016.4.
33. Mousavi SN, Sepehvand R, Fathi Chegini F. Organizational Cronyism and Procrastination: Analyzing the Deterrent Effect of Social Capital in Public Organizations. Journal of Social Capital Management. 2023;10(1):32-45.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shahryar Eskandari (Author); Abdolhamid Safaei Ghadikolaei; Mohammad Valipour Khatir (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
