The Role of Cryptocurrency Activities in Facilitating Iran’s Foreign Trade under International Financial Restrictions: Integrating Evidence from the ARDL Model and Expert Thematic Analysis

Authors

Keywords:

cryptocurrency, foreign trade, economic sanctions, ARDL model, transaction cost theory

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the role of cryptocurrency activities in facilitating Iran’s foreign trade under international financial restrictions. The primary focus was on identifying the short- and long-run effects of cryptocurrency activity and explaining the mechanisms through which digital assets may reduce transaction costs, as well as the institutional constraints and risks associated with their use. The study employed a mixed-methods approach. In the quantitative phase, 131 monthly observations covering January 2015 to November 2025 were examined. Iran’s merchandise trade volume was calculated as the sum of FOB exports and CIF imports, cryptocurrency activity was measured using Bitcoin spot trading volume, and the oil price was obtained from the monthly average Brent crude oil price. Following the application of the augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) and Phillips–Perron (PP) tests, an ARDL(1,1,1) model, the bounds test, and an error correction model were estimated. Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) standard errors were employed to account for conditional heteroskedasticity. In the qualitative phase, data obtained from 18 semi-structured interviews with experts were analyzed using thematic analysis and integrated with the quantitative findings. The findings indicated that the bounds test confirmed the existence of a long-run relationship among the variables. Cryptocurrency activity had a positive and statistically significant short-run effect on foreign trade; specifically, a 1% increase in cryptocurrency activity was associated with a 0.039% increase in trade. However, the long-run cryptocurrency coefficient was positive but statistically insignificant. The full reimposition of sanctions reduced the level of monthly trade by approximately 23.3%, whereas the oil price had a positive and statistically significant long-run effect. The error correction coefficient indicated that 39.5% of disequilibrium was corrected each month. The thematic analysis also identified five themes: payment facilitation, dual macroeconomic consequences, retail investment behavior, institutional challenges, and policy lessons. Based on the findings, cryptocurrencies may serve as a complementary payment channel capable of reducing part of the friction in foreign trade in the short run; however, no evidence was obtained of a persistent long-run effect. Effective utilization of this potential requires risk-based regulation, infrastructure security, and a clear distinction between commercial payments and speculative activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Goldfarb A, Tucker C. Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 2019;57(1):3-43. doi: 10.1257/jel.20171452.

2. Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. 2008.

3. Catalini C, Gans JS. Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain. Communications of the ACM. 2020;63(7):80-90. doi: 10.1145/3359552.

4. Böhme R, Christin N, Edelman B, Moore T. Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2015;29(2):213-38. doi: 10.1257/jep.29.2.213.

5. Yermack D. Corporate Governance and Blockchains. Review of Finance. 2017;21(1):7-31. doi: 10.1093/rof/rfw074.

6. Treiblmaier H. The Impact of Blockchain on the Supply Chain: A Theory-Based Research Framework and a Call for Action. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2018;23(6):545-59. doi: 10.1108/SCM-01-2018-0029.

7. Reuter M. Decrypting Crypto: How to Estimate International Stablecoin Flows. International Monetary Fund, 2025.

8. Kim S, Miksjuk A, Suryakumar N, Tuladhar A, Velculescu D, Wu Y, et al. Digital Money, Cross-Border Payments, International Reserves, and the Global Financial Safety Net: Preliminary Considerations. International Monetary Fund, 2024.

9. Cerutti EM, Firat M, Perez-Saiz H. Estimating the Impact of Digital Money on Cross-Border Flows: Scenario Analysis Covering the Intensive Margin. International Monetary Fund, 2025.

10. Cardozo P, Fernández A, Jiang J, Rojas FD. On Cross-Border Crypto Flows: Measurement, Drivers, and Policy Implications. International Monetary Fund, 2024.

11. Reuter M, Agur I, Copestake A, Martinez Peria MS, Teoh K. Payment Frictions, Capital Flows, and Exchange Rates. International Monetary Fund, 2025.

12. Auer R, Lewrick U, Paulick J. DeFiying Gravity? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Border Bitcoin, Ether and Stablecoin Flows. Bank for International Settlements, 2025.

13. Bains P, Ismail A, Melo F, Sugimoto N. Regulating the Crypto Ecosystem: The Case of Stablecoins and Arrangements. International Monetary Fund, 2022.

14. Schär F. Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-Based Financial Markets. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review. 2021;103(2):153-74. doi: 10.20955/r.103.153-174.

15. Aramonte S, Huang W, Schrimpf A. DeFi Risks and the Decentralisation Illusion. Bank for International Settlements, 2021.

16. Alnasaa M, Gueorguiev N, Honda J, Imamoglu E, Mauro P, Primus K, et al. Crypto, Corruption, and Capital Controls: Cross-Country Correlations. International Monetary Fund, 2022.

17. Scharnowski S. Dark Web Traffic, Privacy Coins, and Cryptocurrency Trading Activity. Finance Research Letters. 2024;67:105875. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105875.

18. Apeti AE, Edoh ED. Economic Sanctions and Sovereign Debt Default. European Journal of Political Economy. 2024;85:102571. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102571.

19. Haidar JI. Sanctions and Export Deflection: Evidence from Iran. Economic Policy. 2017;32(90):319-55. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix002.

20. Ianchovichina E, Devarajan S, Lakatos C. Lifting Economic Sanctions on Iran: Global Effects and Strategic Responses. World Bank, 2016.

21. Zhao J, Miao J. Is Bitcoin Used to Evade Financial Sanction? Finance Research Letters. 2023;55:104005. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104005.

22. Babazadeh Y, Feghi Farahmand N, Pasbani M, Alavi Matin Y. A Conceptual Model of Facilitating Indicators for the Use of Cryptocurrencies in International Exchanges under Sanctions. International Business Management. 2021;4(1):167-88.

23. Saeed Vaziri K. The Impact of Cryptocurrencies on Unilateral Sanctions. Law of New Technologies. 2021;2(4):133-54.

24. Haji-Molamirzaei H, Najafi Jozah H, Babak M. A Cryptocurrency Policymaking Model in the Islamic Republic of Iran with Emphasis on the Security-Economic Threats of Cryptocurrencies. Defense Economics and Sustainable Development. 2022;7(25):149-70.

25. Chainalysis. Inside Iran’s Growing $7.8 Billion Crypto Ecosystem: IRGC Dominance and a Flight to Bitcoin Reflect Geopolitical Tensions and Domestic Unrest. 2026.

26. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2001;16(3):289-326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

How to Cite

Khalaj Hedayati, Z. ., & Mehrara, M. (2026). The Role of Cryptocurrency Activities in Facilitating Iran’s Foreign Trade under International Financial Restrictions: Integrating Evidence from the ARDL Model and Expert Thematic Analysis. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 4(4), 1-20. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/447

Similar Articles

21-30 of 248

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.