The Role of Environmental and Social Responsibility in Reducing the Cost of Financing of Petrochemical Companies

Masoud Loghavian Zadeh

Authors

Masoud Loghavian Zadeh M.A. Student, Department of Accounting, Dey.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Deylam, Iran https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6598-2320

Keywords:

environmental responsibility, social responsibility, cost of financing, petrochemical companies, Tehran Stock Exchange

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the role of environmental and social responsibility in reducing the cost of financing of petrochemical companies. In terms of purpose, this study was applied, and in terms of methodology, it employed a descriptive-correlational design. The statistical population consisted of all financial managers, deputy financial managers, and internal auditors of petrochemical companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange; according to official information, this population was estimated at 120 individuals. Using the Krejcie and Morgan table, the required sample size was determined to be 92 individuals. Following questionnaire distribution and collection, 85 completed and valid questionnaires were retained for the final analysis. The data collection instrument was a researcher-developed questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale, with its items adapted from validated measures used in previous studies. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through consultation with university professors and subject-matter experts, while construct validity, including convergent and discriminant validity, was assessed using the average variance extracted (AVE) and the Fornell–Larcker criterion. Instrument reliability was also confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability (CR), both of which exceeded the threshold of .70. SMART PLS 3 software and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed to test the hypotheses and assess the fit of the conceptual model. The path analysis results indicated that all four research hypotheses were supported at the 95% confidence level, indicating that both environmental and social responsibility had positive and statistically significant effects on reducing the cost of debt financing and increasing shareholders’ equity. The findings suggest that petrochemical companies can reduce investors’ perceived risk and gain access to less expensive and more attractive sources of financing by improving their environmental and social performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Deegan C, Rankin M, Tobin J. An Examination of the Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2002;15(3):312-43. doi: 10.1108/09513570210435861.

2. Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2015;5(4):210-33. doi: 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.

3. Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal. 2014;35(1):1-23. doi: 10.1002/smj.2131.

4. Hasan I, Hoi CK, Wu Q, Zhang H. Social Capital and Debt Contracting: Evidence from Bank Loans and Public Bonds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2017;52(3):1017-47. doi: 10.1017/S0022109017000205.

5. Pedersen LH, Fitzgibbons S, Pomorski L. Responsible Investing: The ESG-Efficient Frontier. Journal of Financial Economics. 2021;142(2):572-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001.

6. Eliwa Y, Aboud A, Saleh A. ESG Practices and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from EU Countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2021;79:102097. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097.

7. Apergis N, Poufinas T, Antonopoulos A. ESG Scores and Cost of Debt. Energy Economics. 2022;112:106186. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186.

8. Magnanelli BS, Izzo MF. Corporate Social Performance and Cost of Debt: The Relationship. Social Responsibility Journal. 2017;13(2):250-65. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-06-2016-0103.

9. Maaloul A, Zéghal D, Ben Amar W, Mansour S. The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Disclosure on Cost of Debt: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review. 2023;26(1):1-18. doi: 10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8.

10. Li Y, Chen R, Xiang E. Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Financial System Guidelines, and Cost of Debt Financing: Evidence from Pollution-Intensive Industries in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022;29(3):593-608. doi: 10.1002/csr.2222.

11. Ji D, Liu Y, Zhang L, An J, Sun W. Green Social Responsibility and Company Financing Cost-Based on Empirical Studies of Listed Companies in China. Sustainability. 2020;12(15):6238. doi: 10.3390/su12156238.

12. Shive SA, Forster MM. Corporate Governance and Pollution Externalities of Public and Private Firms. The Review of Financial Studies. 2020;33(3):1296-330. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhz079.

13. Gjergji R, Vena L, Sciascia S, Cortesi A. The Effects of Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure on the Cost of Capital in Small and Medium Enterprises: The Role of Family Business Status. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(1):683-93. doi: 10.1002/bse.2647.

14. Chouaibi Y, Zouari G. The Mediating Role of Real Earnings Management in the Relationship between CSR Practices and Cost of Equity: Evidence from European ESG Data. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2024;19(2):314-37. doi: 10.1108/EMJB-12-2021-0183.

15. Amarna K, Garde Sánchez R, López-Pérez MV, Marzouk M. The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure and Real Earning Management on the Cost of Financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2024;31(4):3181-93. doi: 10.1002/csr.2740.

16. Kanbaty M, Hellmann A, He L. Infographics in Corporate Sustainability Reports: Providing Useful Information or Used for Impression Management? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 2020;26:100309. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100309.

17. Zhong M, Gao L. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Improve Firm Investment Efficiency? Evidence from China. Review of Accounting and Finance. 2017;16(3):348-65. doi: 10.1108/RAF-06-2016-0095.

18. Yang X, Shira RK, Dang LP, Hao P. Unforeseen Benefits: Can ESG Enhance Corporate Access to Commercial Credit Financing? Research in International Business and Finance. 2025;75:102735. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102735.

19. Xu Q, Ruan C, Jiang C, Zhao Q. The Impact of ESG Performance on Debt Financing Costs from the Perspective of Supply Chain. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2025:102064. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2025.102064.

20. Bai M, Ho L. Corporate Social Performance and Firm Debt Levels: Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Institutional Environments. Finance Research Letters. 2022;47:102968. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102968.

21. Abgineh M, Ghanbari M, Rahmani M. A Financial Performance Model Based on Environmental Information Disclosure in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge. 2023;12(45):17-38.

22. Kazemi Z, Noushadi A, Darrehnejad M, Veisi M, editors. The Effect of Environmental Disclosure on the Relationship between Mandatory and Voluntary Environmental Costs and Tax Avoidance in Petrochemical and Chemical Industry Companies2025; Tehran.

23. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2009.