Investigating the Impact of ESG Disclosure Quality on Liquidity Risk and Financial Flexibility: The Moderating Role of Cash Holdings
Keywords:
ESG disclosure quality, sustainability reporting, liquidity risk, financial flexibility, cash holdings, Tehran Stock ExchangeAbstract
This study aimed to examine the effect of ESG disclosure quality on liquidity risk and financial flexibility, with emphasis on the moderating role of cash holdings among companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. This applied study employed a descriptive-correlational research design based on panel data analysis. Based on theoretical foundations in sustainability reporting and financial structure literature, multiple regression models were developed. Data extracted from companies’ financial statements and management discussion reports were analyzed using the Generalized Least Squares (GLS) method. The findings indicated that improving the quality of sustainability and ESG disclosures contributes significantly to reducing liquidity risk and enhancing corporate financial stability by decreasing information asymmetry and improving stakeholder relationships. Furthermore, ESG-related risks, such as reputational risks, increase the likelihood of stakeholder sanctions and make external financing more costly. In this regard, cash holdings played a significant moderating role. Companies exposed to ESG-related risks increased their cash holdings based on a precautionary motive to cope with adverse financial shocks and maintain operational continuity. This cash buffer mitigated the effects of financial constraints and contributed to preserving financial flexibility. ESG disclosure quality is not merely a tool for increasing transparency; rather, it serves as a strategic mechanism for managing liquidity risk and enhancing financial flexibility. By adopting optimal cash holding policies, managers can mitigate the negative consequences of reputational risks and cash flow fluctuations and ensure corporate continuity and financial stability under conditions of economic uncertainty.
Downloads
References
1. Pourghalmi Dafchahi G, Samadi Largani M, Alikhani R, Pourali MR. Evaluating Sustainability Disclosure Quality and Its Impact on Sustainability Performance Based on Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Auditing Management Knowledge. 2023;12(46):275-96.
2. Amosh HA. Exploring the Influence of Accounting Reporting Complexity On ESG Disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2025;32(5):5760-78. doi: 10.1002/csr.70000.
3. Yang J. Study on the Impact of ESG Disclosure Quality on Corporate Value. Tebmr. 2024;12:79-85. doi: 10.62051/e1cqab70.
4. Schiehll E, Kolahgar S. Common Ownership and Investor-Focused Disclosure: Evidence From ESG Financial Materiality. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024. doi: 10.1002/bse.4002.
5. Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal. 2014. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1847085.
6. Li W, Xu Y, Zhou H. ESG disclosure and cost of capital: Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2023;15(8):6120. doi: 10.3390/su15086120.
7. Kao MF, Jian CH, Tseng CH. Managerial ability and voluntary ESG disclosure and assurance: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2024;15(1):207-31. doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2022-0428.
8. Sun Y, San Z, Xu C, Davey H. The Nexus of Managerial Myopia and Transparency in ESG Information: Evidence from the Textual Analysis of ESG Disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2025. doi: 10.1002/csr.3242.
9. El Ghoul S, Guedhami O, Kwok CCY, Mishra DR. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital? Journal of Banking & Finance. 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007.
10. Sajadirad T, Darabi R. The Effect of ESG Performance on Financing Costs with the Moderating Role of Green Financing. Strategic Management Accounting. 2025;2(3):87-110.
11. Hasan MM, Habib A, Zhao R. Corporate Reputation Risk and Cash Holdings. Accounting & Finance. 2022;62(1):667-707. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12803.
12. Ahmadi H, Mousavi S, Anousha M, Sedaghat M. Investigating the Effect of Reputation Risk on Cash Holdings with the Moderating Role of Financial Constraints and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange. Novin Research Approaches in Management and Accounting. 2024;7(19):101-31.
13. Fatemi A, Glaum M, Kaiser S. ESG Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Disclosure. Global Finance Journal. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.
14. Mukhtar B, Shad MK, Woon LF, Haider M, Waqas A. Integrating ESG Disclosure into the Relationship between CSR and Green Organizational Culture toward Green Innovation. Social Responsibility Journal. 2024;20(2):288-304. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-03-2023-0125.
15. Opler T, Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, Williamson R. The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings. Journal of Financial Economics. 1999. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00051-8.
16. Harford J, Mansi SA, Maxwell WF. Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics. 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.04.002.
17. Mehrabanpour MR, Faraji O, Sajjadpour R. The Mediating Role of Financial Reporting Quality in the Relationship between Financial Statement Comparability and Cash Holdings. Accounting and Auditing Review. 2020;27(1):132-53.
18. Hekmat H, Rahmani A, Movaffagh S. The Effect of Sustainability Reporting Disclosure and Accounting Information Comparability on Earnings Persistence. Accounting and Auditing Reviews. 2025;32(1):95-116.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fatemeh Aghazadeh; Seifullah Aghazadeh (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
