Analysis of Capability–Attractiveness for the Application of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Smart Warehousing of Chain Stores with a Sustainability Approach.

Authors

    Amirmohammad Shirani MA student, Department of System Management and Decision Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
    Mansour Momeni Professor, Department of System Management and Decision Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
    Fatemeh Saghafi * Associate Professor, Department of System Management and Decision Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Fsaghafi@ut.ac.ir

Keywords:

Capability–Attractiveness, Industry 4, 0 Technology, Smart Warehousing, Chain Stores, Sustainability

Abstract

Chain stores have expanded significantly. Warehouse management is one of the vital activities in the chain store industry; because performing it improperly can lead to delays in the supply and distribution of required goods, customer dissatisfaction, increased waste, the need for employee overtime, and increased operational costs. Therefore, it is evident that the use of technologies manifested in the Fourth Industrial Revolution significantly leads to saving time, energy, and costs; and in contrast, neglecting these technologies not only brings financial and operational losses, but can also lead to losing a competitive position in the market. An issue that has received less attention so far is the necessity of ranking and prioritizing the application of the technologies of this revolution based on their capability–attractiveness and scope of applications. Therefore, this research has been conducted with the aim of analyzing the capability–attractiveness of the application of Industry 4.0 technologies in smart warehousing of chain stores with a sustainability approach. A comprehensive analysis of the collected data from the expert community including academic specialists, artificial intelligence specialists, and software engineers was considered. Considering the deep information and knowledge of this group in the field of Industry 4.0 technologies and smart warehousing of chain stores, their views were considered vital for weighting the indicators. For this purpose, specialized questionnaires were distributed among this panel in order to record and collect their opinions regarding the “attractiveness” and “capability” indicators. In the analysis section, first the weights of the indicators were determined using the Best–Worst Method. Then, the various applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in smart warehousing of chain stores were evaluated using the VIKOR ranking method. The results show that the possibility of searching for and finding a specific item in the warehouse in the shortest possible time and the automatic registration of inventory reduction of goods from a shelf or pallet in the warehouse system indicate high attractiveness and capability. Also, the possibility of being aware of the most suitable location for placing goods based on the latest layout indicates low attractiveness and high capability. Also, access to real-time warehouse inventory, elimination of human errors during loading and shipping of goods, optimization of warehouse space considering awareness of the optimal order quantity of goods indicate high attractiveness but low capability. Also, accurate inventory counting in the shortest time, automatic recording of inspection, maintenance and repair data, intelligent connection of machinery and equipment to each other in warehouse management, awareness of the exact inventory of warehouse shelves or pallets at the time of placement indicate low attractiveness and capability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ramanathan U, Mathirajan M, Balakrishnan S. Role of E-Tailing: A New Way of Business During COVID Situation in India – A Critical View. Benchmarking an International Journal. 2024;31(3):1062-72. doi: 10.1108/bij-04-2024-785.

2. Guo T, Palaoag TD. Artificial Intelligence Driven E-Commerce Business Model Under New Retail Environment. 2023. doi: 10.4108/eai.2-12-2022.2328056.

3. Odeyinka OF, Omoegun OG. Warehouse Operations: An Examination of Traditional and Automated Approaches in Supply Chain Management. 2024. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.113147.

4. Hrouga M, Sbihi A. Logistics 4.0 for Supply Chain Performance: Perspectives From A retailing Case Study. Business Process Management Journal. 2023;29(6):1892-919. doi: 10.1108/bpmj-03-2023-0183.

5. Kandarkar PC, Ravi V. Investigating the Impact of Smart Manufacturing and Interconnected Emerging Technologies in Building Smarter Supply Chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2024;35(5):984-1009. doi: 10.1108/jmtm-11-2023-0498.

6. Khan N, Solvang WD, Yu H, Rolland BE. Towards the Design of a Smart Warehouse Management System for Spare Parts Management in the Oil and Gas Sector. Frontiers in Sustainability. 2024;5. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2024.1426089.

7. Hamilton JR, Maxwell S, Ali S, Tee S. Adding External Artificial Intelligence (AI) Into Internal Firm-Wide Smart Dynamic Warehousing Solutions. Sustainability. 2024;16(10):3908. doi: 10.3390/su16103908.

8. Nguyen MD, Yeon KT, Rudzki K, Nguyen HP, Pham NDK. Strategies for Developing Logistics Centres: Technological Trends and Policy Implications. Polish Maritime Research. 2023;30(4):129-47. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2023-0066.

9. Gund HP, Daniel J. Q-Commerce or E-Commerce? A systematic State of the Art On comparative Last-Mile Logistics Greenhouse Gas Emissions Literature Review. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 2023;6(3):185-207. doi: 10.1108/ijieom-01-2023-0001.

10. Mukherjee T, Sangal I, Sarkar B, Almaamari Q, Alkadash TM. How Effective Is Reverse Cross-Docking and Carbon Policies in Controlling Carbon Emission From the Fashion Industry? Mathematics. 2023;11(13):2880. doi: 10.3390/math11132880.

11. Singh R, Rani S, Kandpal V. Driving Environmental Resilience: Integrating Industry 4.0 for Circular Economy. Green Futures: Navigating the Path to Environmental Resilience. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. p. 23-40.

12. Bueno-Pascual F-E. Forces Transforming Transport and Logistics Into Smarter Sustainable Systems. 2024. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1005001.

13. Li R, Liu W, Ye X. Analysis of Green Supply Chain Construction and Driving Factors in the Context of New Retail: Case Study of JD.com. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences. 2024;112(1):132-40. doi: 10.54254/2754-1169/112/20242310.

14. Minashkina D. A Review and Research Agenda For recent Socially and Environmentally Sustainable Practices for Warehouse Management Systems. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2024;35(7):60-98. doi: 10.1108/ijlm-07-2023-0265.

15. Luo J. Sustainable Supply Chain Strategies in E-Commerce: Case Studies of Amazon and Cainiao. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences. 2023;65(1):181-7. doi: 10.54254/2754-1169/65/20231629.

16. Jovanović SV, Đoković G, Pušara A, Pavićević A. The Concept of Sustainability in E-Commerce and Busines. Ecologica. 2023;30(109):67-75. doi: 10.18485/ecologica.2023.30.109.10.

17. Shi T, Lee SJ, Li Q. Smart Supply Chain Management in Business Education: Reflection on the Pandemics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 2023;22(1):19-32. doi: 10.1111/dsji.12303.

18. Golińska-Dawson P, Mrugalska B, Lai KK, Weber GW. Editorial: Smart and Sustainable Supply Chain and Logistics - trends, Challenges, Methods and Best Practices. Annals of Operations Research. 2023;324(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05304-7.

19. Liu Z. On Supply Chain Risk in Retail IndustryTaking Costco as an Example. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences. 2024;92(1):209-17. doi: 10.54254/2754-1169/92/20231300.

20. Brown WL, Johnson O, Wilson G. The Impact of 5G Technology on Retail Marketing and Supply Chain Operations. 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202407.2073.v1.

21. Czerniachowska K, Wichniarek R, Żywicki K. A Model for an Order-Picking Problem With a One-Directional Conveyor and Buffer. Sustainability. 2023;15(18):13731. doi: 10.3390/su151813731.

22. Karthikeyan KS, Nagaprakash T. Prioritizing IoT-driven Sustainability Initiatives in Retail Chains: Exploring Case Studies and Industry Insights. Eai Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things. 2023;10. doi: 10.4108/eetiot.4628.

23. Chaplynska N, Chelombitko YK. Digitalization of Supply Chain Management (Based on the Sports Industry Company Signa Sports United). Business Economics Sustainability Leadership and Innovation. 2023(10):64-80. doi: 10.37659/2663-5070-2023-10-64-80.

24. Zeinati B, Taleghani M, Sharj-Sharifi A. Designing Industry 4.0 maturity dimensions in the banking services supply chain and digital banking development using a grounded theory approach. 2025.

25. Oliveira J, Schreiber D, Jahno VD. Sustainability in civil construction through Industry 4.0 and BIM technologies. Automation in Construction. 2026;182:106729. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106729.

26. Raza Z, Haq IU, Muneeb M. Agri-4-All: A Framework for Blockchain Based Agricultural Food Supply Chains in the Era of Fourth Industrial Revolution. Ieee Access. 2023;11:29851-67. doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3259962.

27. Thanasas G, Kampiotis G, Halkiopoulos C. Transforming digital accounting: Big data, IoT, and Industry 4.0 technologies-A comprehensive survey. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2026;19(1):92. doi: 10.3390/jrfm19010092.

Downloads

Published

2027-07-01

Submitted

2026-01-10

Revised

2026-03-25

Accepted

2026-05-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shirani, A. ., Momeni, M. ., & Saghafi, F. (2027). Analysis of Capability–Attractiveness for the Application of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Smart Warehousing of Chain Stores with a Sustainability Approach. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-14. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/313

Similar Articles

1-10 of 195

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.