Identification and Leveling of Production Technology Selection Indicators in Iran’s Steel Industry Using Qualitative Content Analysis

Authors

    Seyyed Javad Hosseini Kafiabad Department of Industrial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
    Hassan Dehghan Dehnavi * Department of Industrial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran Denavi2000@iau.ac.ir
    Abolfazl Sadeghian Department of Industrial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
    Mozhde Rabbani Department of Industrial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
    Mohammad Taghi Honary Department of Industrial Management, Ya.C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Keywords:

Production technology, steel industry, content analysis

Abstract

The main objective of the present study was to identify and level the indicators for selecting production technology in Iran’s steel industry using qualitative content analysis. The first step of the research was related to identifying production technology selection indicators in industries, and the statistical population included articles related to the identification of production technology selection indicators in industries. The population size was 124 articles, and the sample size was considered to be 71 articles. The sampling method in this section was judgmental sampling. The second to fourth steps of the research addressed the localization, analysis of influencing and influenced relationships, and leveling of production technology selection indicators in Iran’s steel industry. The statistical population in this section included academic scholars and industry experts who were knowledgeable about production technology selection indicators in Iran’s steel industry. The sample size in this section was determined to be 12 experts. The sampling method in this stage was purposive sampling. The data collection method and instrument in the first step consisted of a library-based study. The data collection instrument in this section involved note-taking and extraction from various articles and books related to the subject. The data collection method in the second, third, and fourth steps was field-based, and the data collection instrument in these steps was a questionnaire. The data analysis method in the first step was the qualitative content analysis approach. In qualitative content analysis, efforts are made to identify and extract content categories present in communication messages through open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Ultimately, by entering the codes into specialized NVivo software, the indicators were screened and finalized through an agreed-upon coding process. In the second step, the Delphi method was used to localize production technology selection indicators in Iran’s steel industry. In the third step, in order to examine the influencing and influenced relationships among production technology selection indicators in Iran’s steel industry, cross-impact analysis was conducted using MICMAC analysis for structural analysis in futures studies. To identify important and key components, both the Direct Method and the Indirect Method were applied. In the fourth step, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was used to level the production technology selection indicators in Iran’s steel industry. Based on the results, the production technology selection indicators in Iran’s steel industry—including technical and operational risk, production flexibility, digitalization capability and intelligentization through artificial intelligence, product quality, operating cost, availability and sustainability of feedstock, price acceptability and volatility of inputs, and supply chain security of equipment—were identified at Level 1 and recognized as the most influenced indicators in the selection of production technology in Iran’s steel industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Yi S, Jung T. Green innovation in the steel industry: Analyzing FINEX technology development through Technology Innovation Systems and Strategic Niche Management. Energy. 2025:137690. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137690.

2. Hromada E, Cermakova K, Kaderabkova B, Kurekova L, Krasnicka M. Strategic Challenges and Opportunities for the Czech Steel Industry: A Path toward Sustainable Competitiveness. International Journal of Economic Sciences. 2025;14(1):333-50. doi: 10.31181/ijes1412025207.

3. Ge W, Liu J, Chang T, Li Y, Sun Y, Zhang S, et al. From iron concentrate to clean steel: A green short-process production technology centered on preparing high-purity iron concentrate. Minerals Engineering. 2025;233:109617. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109617.

4. Shu DY, Vargas-Ibáñez LT, Batôt G, Devaux F, Moreau VS, Leenders L, et al. Demonstration of the DMX™ technology for carbon capture and storage in steel production: An environmental assessment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2025;146:104396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104396.

5. Li Y, Li J, Sun M, Guo Y, Cheng F, Gao C. Analysis of carbon neutrality technology path selection in the steel industry under policy incentives. Energy. 2024;292:130550. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130550.

6. Moradi E. Technology selection in the steel industry based on multi-criteria decision-making models: Fuzzy TOPSIS and AHP. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 2023;41:251. doi: 10.47577/tssj.v41i1.8539.

7. Van Thanh N, Tinh NV, Nhi THT. Strategic decision making at a steel industry assisted by fuzzy theory and multicriteria decision making model. IEEE Access. 2023;11:141860-70. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3341364.

8. Tojiboyeva M. The properties of the yarn are determined by the properties of the raw material and the methods of its processing. In this regard, studies of yarn production are divided into two groups: selection of raw materials and technology of yarn production. The wo. Nordic_Press. 2025;6(0006).

9. Matieiko O. Selection of optimal schemes for the inerting process of cargo tanks of gas carriers. Technology Audit and Production Reserves. 2024;4(1 (78)):43-50. doi: 10.15587/2706-5448.2024.310699.

10. Li Y, Xu J, Liu F, Zhang X. Impact and Mechanism of Digital Information Selection on Farmers' Ecological Production Technology Adoption: A Study on Wheat Farmers in China. Agriculture. 2024;14(5):713. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14050713.

11. Amraei A, Mehrinejad S, Bayattork A. Evaluation of the Competitiveness Model in the Steel Industry with a Technology Transfer Approach. Industrial Management Journal. 2024;16(2):175-91.

12. Kuberskii SV, Sbitnev SA, Velikotsky RE, Smolyarchuk DA, Vakulenko EL, Smolyarchuk SA. Improvements in steel production technology for main pipelines. Metallurgist. 2024;68(2):145-55. doi: 10.1007/s11015-024-01713-6.

13. Churikova L, Akhmetzhan S, Gumarov G, Mukambetkaliyeva A, Gubaidullin K. Selection of the optimal technology to prevent sand production, taking into account rock deconsolidation in the bottomhole formation zone. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik. 2024;39(4):115-24. doi: 10.17794/rgn.2024.4.9.

14. Ourya I, Abderafi S. Clean technology selection of hydrogen production on an industrial scale in Morocco. Results in engineering. 2023;17:100815. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100815.

15. Taran N, Nemţeanu S, Ponomariova I, Covalciuc O, Degteari N. Development of the production technology of divine "succes" from new selection and local varieties. Modern Technologies in the Food Industry2024. p. 20-39.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Submitted

2025-11-05

Revised

2026-02-18

Accepted

2026-02-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hosseini Kafiabad , S. J. ., Dehghan Dehnavi, H., Sadeghian , A. ., Rabbani, M. ., & Honary, M. T. . . (2026). Identification and Leveling of Production Technology Selection Indicators in Iran’s Steel Industry Using Qualitative Content Analysis. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-20. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/225

Similar Articles

131-140 of 158

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.