Assessing the Impact of Good Governance Components on the Sustainability of Cooperative Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Bushehr Province During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

    Mohammad Ali Tamari Department of Sociology, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Sasan Vadieh * Department of Sociology, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Sasanvadiea@iauctb.ac.ir
    Khalil Mirzaei Department of Sociology, Ro.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

 good governance, government crisis management, business crisis management, small and medium, sized enterprises, business success, COVID, 19 pandemic, Bushehr Province

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the impact of the components of good governance, government crisis management, and business crisis management on the sustainability and success of cooperative small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bushehr Province during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study adopted a descriptive–survey and correlational design. The statistical population comprised 3,500 cooperative SMEs operating in Bushehr Province, from which 343 units were selected as the sample using cluster random sampling based on the Morgan table. Data were collected using a researcher-developed 45-item questionnaire with confirmed validity (CVR = 0.856) and reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.836). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26, applying Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analysis. The correlational findings indicated that the relationship between government crisis management (r = 0.417, p < 0.01) and business crisis management (r = 0.368, p < 0.01) with business success was positive and statistically significant. In contrast, the relationship between good governance and business success was weak (r = 0.063) and not statistically significant (p = 0.245). The regression results showed that the model consisting of the three independent variables collectively explained 24.1% of the variance in business success (adjusted R² = 0.241). Analysis of standardized beta coefficients revealed that business crisis management (β = 0.342) was the strongest positive and significant predictor of success, followed by government crisis management (β = 0.315). Surprisingly, good governance exerted a negative and statistically significant effect on business success (β = −0.152). The findings suggest that under crisis conditions, agency—manifested in crisis management undertaken by businesses themselves—and the operational performance of government at the frontline of the crisis played a more decisive role in ensuring the sustainability and success of SMEs than did macro-level governance structures. These results underscore the need to redefine crisis-support policies by focusing on strengthening firms’ internal resilience and improving the quality of direct, tangible governmental actions.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Arulrajah AA. Literature Review on Good Governance in the Organizations through Human Resource Management: A Corporate Level Analysis. International Business Research. 2016;9(8):14-23. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v9n8p14.

2. Nouri R, editor Investigating Good Governance Indicators from Different Perspectives in Public and Private Organizations. Fifth International Conference on Management, Accounting, Economics, and Social Sciences; 2020 2020-03-06; Hamedan, Iran.

3. Ahmadpour S, Daneshfard K, Tolouei Ashlaghi A, Rahnamaye Roodposhti F. Designing a Human Resource Empowerment Model Based on Good Governance. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations. 2021;4(2):157-80.

4. Bazi M, editor Good governance and organizational empowerment. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Theoretical Approaches and New Technologies in Administrative Sciences; 2022.

5. Dangal J. The Role of Good Governance in Strengthening Public Administration Nepalese Perspectives. PAAN Journal. 2025;31:1793-803. doi: 10.3126/paanj.v31i01.73605.

6. Sindelo L, Cronje S. Mechanisms of Ensuring Accountability: The Importance of Accountability in Promoting Good Governance in the South African Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration. 2024;59(1):44-52. doi: 10.53973/jopa.2024.59.1.a5.

7. Kamrani S, Baghaei Sarabs A, Mirzaei K. Thematic Analysis of Barriers to Good Governance in the Iranian Organizational System. Strategic Research on Social Issues in Iran. 2023;11(3).

8. Akbari Z, Hakak M, vahdati h, Nazarpouri a. Designing Good Governance Trilogy Pattern in Multilevel Organizations. Journal of Strategic Management Studies. 2020;10(40):195-221.

9. Taheriattar G. Ethical Leadership as a Facilitator of Good Governance Realization. Public Organizations Management. 2017;6(1):115-30.

10. Nguyen TTU, Nguyen PV, Huynh HTN, Vrontis D, Ahmed ZU. Identification of the determinants of public trust in e-government services and participation in social media based on good governance theory and the technology acceptance model. Journal of Asia Business Studies. 2024;18(1):44-61. doi: 10.1108/JABS-04-2023-0160.

11. Palmi P, Corallo A, Prete MI, Harris P. Balancing exploration and exploitation in public management: Proposal for an organizational model. Journal of Public Affairs. 2021;21(3):e2245. doi: 10.1002/pa.2245.

12. Jamshidi A, editor Examining the role of human resource empowerment and good governance agility in private organizations. Tenth National Conference on New Studies and Research in the Fields of Humanities, Management, and Entrepreneurship in Iran; 2023: Tehran.

13. Mustafa D, Sulaiman S, Nurdin R. The Role of Organizational Investment in Social Capital, Information Technology and Service Commitment on Employee Performance With Good Governance Principles as Intervening Variables. 2019. doi: 10.4108/eai.3-10-2018.2284321.

14. Saito Y, Rose JA. Reputation-based Decentralized Autonomous Organization for the non-profit sector: Leveraging blockchain to enhance good governance. Frontiers in Blockchain. 2023;5:1083647. doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2022.1083647.

15. Sjaifudian H. Inovasi, partisipasi dan good governance: 20 prakarsa inovatif dan partisipatif di Indonesia: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia; 2025.

16. Taloukolaei FR, Zameni F, Enayati T. Qualitative Identification of Dimensions and Components of Good Governance in Relation to Organizational Intimacy and Organizational Development at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. International Journal of Innovation Management and Organizational Behavior (IJIMOB). 2023;3(1):71-81. doi: 10.61838/kman.ijimob.3.1.9.

17. Rezazadeh Taloukolaei F, Zameni F, Enayati T. Identifying the Dimensions and Components of Good Governance and Organizational Development at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 2024;7(1):113-23. doi: 10.61838/kman.ijes.7.1.11.

18. Tork-Zahraeni A, Daryai A, Mohammadi-Khoshuei H. Macroeconomic Instability, Good Governance Indicators, and Earnings Management in the Iranian Capital Market. Scientific Journal of Financial Accounting Studies. 2024;11(3):159-29.

19. Panahy I, Araei V, Jamshidi M. Validation of good governance model from an economic perspective. Iranian Pattern of Progress. 2022;10(2):-.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2026-02-02

Revised

2026-03-10

Accepted

2026-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tamari, M. A. ., Vadieh, S., & Mirzaei, K. . (2026). Assessing the Impact of Good Governance Components on the Sustainability of Cooperative Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Bushehr Province During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 4(4), 1-10. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/182

Similar Articles

31-40 of 238

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.