Meta-Synthesis of Factors Affecting the Securitization of Bank Claims Collateral through the Capital Market
Keywords:
Securitization, Bank Collateral, Non-Performing Loans, Capital Market, Production Growth, Behavioral EconomicsAbstract
The securitization of bank claims collateral, as one of the modern financing instruments, can play an effective role in enhancing banks’ lending capacity and supporting the growth of production in the national economy. The purpose of this study is to present a comprehensive model for the securitization of bank claims collateral through the capital market, with a financing-oriented approach to economic enterprises active in various productive sectors. This study was conducted during the period 2023–2024 and, from a methodological perspective, is qualitative in nature and based on the meta-synthesis method. Accordingly, through a systematic search of scientific sources and the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the results of 15 relevant domestic and international studies were collected and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding. The findings indicate that four main dimensions—legal, structural, economic, and behavioral—directly influence the success of the securitization process of bank claims collateral. In the legal dimension, the existence of legal gaps, regulatory complexity, and jurisprudential ambiguities are among the most significant barriers to the effective utilization of this instrument. In the structural dimension, factors such as information transparency, the quality of underlying assets, and the design of securitization contracts play a decisive role. In the economic dimension, variables such as credit risk, capital market conditions, and investors’ expected rate of return are of particular importance. Moreover, in the behavioral dimension, the application of behavioral economics concepts and nudges can strengthen the motivation of investors and financial institutions for active participation in the securitization process. Based on the meta-synthesis results, the proposed model provides a systematic and multidimensional framework for the securitization of bank claims collateral which, while reducing banks’ non-performing loans, contributes to strengthening productive enterprises and supporting production growth policies. The findings of this study can offer a practical foundation for policymakers, supervisory authorities, and banking managers in designing and implementing effective capital market–based financing strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Haroorany M, Arab-Mazar A, Arabi SH. Investigation of Legal and Executive Impediments to the Securitization of Banks' Current Assets from an Economic and Jurisprudential Perspective. Majlis & Rahbord Quarterly. 2024;31(119).
2. Filomeni S. Securitization and risk appetite: Empirical evidence from US banks. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2024;63:433-68. doi: 10.1007/s11156-024-01261-9.
3. Barra C, Ruggiero N. Bank-specific factors and credit risk: Evidence from Italian banks in different local markets. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 2023;31(3):316-50. doi: 10.1108/JFRC-04-2022-0051.
4. Erdas ML, Ezanoglu Z. How do bank-specific factors impact non-performing loans: Evidence from G20 countries. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice. 2022;11(2):97-122. doi: 10.2478/jcbtp-2022-0015.
5. Chowdhury MAI, Uddin MS, Ullah H, Ahmmed M, Shadek MJ. What causes non-performing loans? Evidence from the Islamic Banking Sector of Bangladesh. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review. 2023;14(1):11-21. doi: 10.46281/ijafr.v14i1.1926.
6. Hassan MK, İslam MT, Ahmed Z, Sarker JI. Islamic banking in Bangladesh: A literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. 2023;16(5):1030-54. doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-05-2022-0185.
7. Tomczak K. Transmission of the 2007-2008 financial crisis in advanced countries of the European Union. Bulletin of Economic Research. 2023;75(1):40-64. doi: 10.1111/boer.12338.
8. Rahman HU, Arian A, Sands J. Does fiscal consolidation affect non-performing loans? Global evidence from heavily indebted countries (HICs). Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2023;16(9):417. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16090417.
9. Kartal MT, Kirikkaleli D, Ayhan F. Nexus between non-performing loans and economic growth in emerging countries: Evidence from Turkey with wavelet coherence approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2023;28(2):1250-60. doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2474.
10. Moeidfar R, Izadinia N, Gholami Siahbomi D. Factors Affecting Banking Delinquencies (A Case Study of Mellat Bank in Isfahan Province). Modern Banking Studies. 2021;4(12):89-135.
11. Gholami Siahbomi D, Moayedfar R, Izadinia N. The Impact of Productive and Non-Productive Assets on the Risk and Performance Indices of Banks Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Asset Management & Financing. 2022;10:5-21.
12. Zare Arand F, Fazeli O. Delay in Settling Banking Claims in Light of Law and Judicial Procedure. Ray. 2022;10:99-125.
13. Salehi M, Rohanimoghaddam M, Qodsi SE. The Role of Criminal Intervention in Bankruptcy Rulings and the Collection of Banking Claims. Criminal Law Research Quarterly. 2022;26:107-30.
14. Ebrahimi SA, Erfani A, Es'haqi Gorji M. Nudge and Behavioral-Based Policies as an Empowering Tool for Reducing Banking Claims. University of Semnan. 2024.
15. Roudari S, Salimifar M, Homayounifar M. The Impact of Social Capital on Banking Claims from the Private and Public Sectors with Emphasis on Government Expenditure Efficiency. Economic Research (Growth & Sustainable Development). 2021;21(1):1-2.
16. Rodri S, Salimifar M, Homayounifar M. A Study on the Impact of Some Determinants of Non-Performing Claims of the Banking Network from the Public Sector under Sanctions Conditions: An Application of Wavelet Transform and Markov Switching Models. Economic Research & Policies. 2021;29(97):131-68. doi: 10.52547/qjerp.29.97.131.
17. Adela HA. The impact of cryptocurrencies capitalization on banking deposits variability in the UAE: Evidence from the NARDL approach. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2025;20(6):2386–405. doi: 10.1108/IJOEM-03-2023-0351.
18. Yāvarī A, Jabbārī H, Panāhiyān H. Designing a Credit Risk Management Model with a Pathological Approach to Guarantees and Collaterals of Bank Facilities. Technology in Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Quarterly. 2025;4(2):1-22. doi: 10.61838/kman.jtesm.4.2.11.
19. Umaternate FF, Mongid A. Modelling non-performing loans (NPL) for small banks in Indonesia: Are macroeconomic factors relevant? International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research. 2023;7(1):57-6. doi: 10.51505/IJEBMR.2023.7106.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Ehsan Keivan (Author); Roya Darabi; Ali Baghani (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.