Designing a Smart Communication and Electronic Service Management Model with Citizens Based on the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) Approach

Authors

    Sara Javan Javidan Department of Management, Fi.C., Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran
    Amir Babak Marjani * Department of Management, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 0041291220@iau.ac.ir
    Farshad Hajalian Department of Management, Fi.C., Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran
    Mansoureh Moradi Department of Management, Fi.C., Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran

Keywords:

Smart communication, Electronic services, S–O–R model, Digital governance, Citizen engagement, Structural equation modeling (SEM)

Abstract

This study aims to design and validate a smart communication and electronic service management model for citizens using the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S–O–R) framework. The research employed a mixed-method exploratory design consisting of qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, in-depth Delphi interviews with experts were conducted to identify components, indicators, and dimensions related to smart communication and digital service delivery. The interviews were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding, and the extracted indicators were refined through iterative expert validation. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire—based on qualitative findings—was administered to a sample of 384 employees selected through Cochran’s formula. Content validity, construct validity, and reliability were examined using confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and AVE. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via SmartPLS was used to test model fit and hypothesized relationships among variables. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests indicated non-normal data distributions across all variables, supporting the use of variance-based SEM. Measurement model evaluation confirmed factor loadings above 0.40 and significant t-values, indicating strong construct validity. Convergent validity was supported with AVE values exceeding 0.50, and internal consistency reliability was demonstrated by Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability values surpassing 0.70. Structural model assessment showed that marketing strategies, environmental website factors, and external socio-economic factors significantly predicted perceived value, perceived quality, perceived security, and perceived ease of use. These organismic states, in turn, strongly influenced behavioral responses, including electronic loyalty, interaction, and information sharing. The GOF index (0.765) indicated excellent overall model fit. The validated S–O–R–based model demonstrates that coordinated digital stimuli and enhanced perceived experience dimensions significantly shape citizens’ digital engagement behaviors, providing a comprehensive framework for improving smart communication and electronic service delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A. What to expect from artificial intelligence. 2017. doi: 10.3386/w24690.

2. Allen B, Tamindael LE, Bickerton SH, Cho W. Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform. Government Information Quarterly. 2019:101412. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412.

3. Hashemi S, Moradi M, Asgarkhani A. Investigating the Role of E-Government in Expediting Legal Affairs and Arbitrations in Iran. 2022;16(58):257-77.

4. Khorram K, Asadi E, Darniyani S. Effective Dimensions in E-Government Development: A Case Study of the Tehran Metropolitan Tax Administration. Intelligent Business Management Studies. 2021;10(38):357-88.

5. Yun S, Kim E, Kim S, Hong T. Does Digital Transformation Accelerate the Acceptance of Social CRM on the Small and Medium Enterprises? 인터넷전자상거래연구. 2023;23(2):155-72. doi: 10.37272/JIECR.2023.04.23.2.155.

6. Taghavifard MT, Ghorbanizadeh V, Hejazi Niyaz R. A Model of Requirements for Implementing E-Government Services on Social Media Platforms: E-Government. Public Management Researches. 2019:150-70.

7. Jafari SMB, Yaghoobi Jahromi Z. The Impact of Social Customer Relationship Management (SCRM) on Customer Relationship Performance. Journal of Business Management Explorations. 2018;10(20).

8. Naim A. Understanding the customer centric approach to add value to social ecrm (SECRM). American Journal of Technology and Applied Sciences. 2022;3:17-31.

9. Arabshahi M, Abbaszadehgaretekan H. The Impact of Electronic Customer Relationship Management (E-CRM) on Marketing Performance by Analyzing the Mediating Role of Product Innovation and Emphasis on Customer Knowledge. Value Creation in Business Management. 2023;3(2):42-61.

10. Savira DA, Hendrayati H, Hurriyati R, editors. The Effect of Electronic Customer Relationship Management (eCRM) on Customer Satisfaction2022: Atlantis Press.

11. Mahfudz M, Batu KL, Almadanaa AV. Are Shared-Goal Congruence, Customer Relationship Management, and Customer Relationship Advantages Matter to Leverage Firm Performance? Indonesia Cases on Retail. Media Ekonomi Dan Manajemen. 2025;40(1):192. doi: 10.56444/mem.v40i1.5449.

12. Khodami S, Jafariniya S, Khalili H. Investigating the Method of Customer Participation in Branding on Social Media Based on UGT Theory and the S-O-R Framework. Modern Marketing Research Quarterly. 2020;10(4):55-80.

13. Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press; 1974.

14. Pahrudin P, Hsieh TH, Liu LW, Wang CC. The role of information sources on tourist behavior post-earthquake disaster in Indonesia: A Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) approach. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8446. doi: 10.3390/su15118446.

15. Jayadi EIP, Murwani IA. The Implementation of S-O-R Framework (Stimulus, Organism, and Response) in User Behavior Analysis of Instagram Shop Features on Purchase Intention. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2022:23-5.

16. Peng W. The Factors Influencing Impulsive Buying Behavior In Live Streaming Shopping Based On SOR Model: University of Jyväskylä; 2025.

17. Bikzad J, Jalilinejad G. Pathology of Digital Governance in E-Government. Journal of Engineering Science Elites. 2021;6(6):17-33.

18. Kiani R. An Inquiry into the Status of Pension Coverage and Support Services for the Elderly Worldwide. Iranian Journal of Health Insurance. 2021;4(3).

19. Jabali A, Abdi S. Social Services and Human Resource Management. A Approach in Business Management Quarterly. 2020;1(1):53-65.

20. Dehdashti Shahrikh Z, Nasehifar V, Mohammadian M, Kiaei M. Customer experience modeling with theme analysis; In line with customer management in the automotive industry. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal. 2023;9(4):23-43.

21. Chen J, Huang Y, Wu EQ, Ip R, Wang K. How does rural tourism experience affect green consumption in terms of memorable rural-based tourism experiences, connectedness to nature and environmental awareness? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2023;54:166-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.12.006.

22. Fakhri F, Motehari M, editors. Application of the (S-O-R) Model in Consumer Behavioral Responses to Retail Brands with a Relationship Marketing Approach. 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Business Management and Economics; 2020.

23. Haudi H, Rahadjeng E, Santamoko R, Putra R, Purwoko D, Nurjannah DKIRWHSAOCY, et al. The role of e-marketing and e-CRM on e-loyalty of Indonesian companies during Covid pandemic and digital era. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2022;10(1):217-24. doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2021.9.006.

24. Akour I, Alshurideh M, Al Kurdi B, Al Ali A, Salloum S. Using machine learning algorithms to predict people's intention to use mobile learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: machine learning approach. JMIR Medical Education. 2021;7(1):e24032. doi: 10.2196/24032.

25. Alshurideh M, Al Kurdi B, Salloum SA, Arpaci I, Al-Emran M. Predicting the actual use of m-learning systems: a comparative approach using PLS-SEM and machine learning algorithms. Interactive Learning Environments. 2020:1-15. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1826982.

26. Egbuhuzor NS, Ajayi A, Akhigbe EE, Agbede OO, Ewim CP, Ajiga DI. AI and Data-Driven Insights: Transforming Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in Financial Services. Gjabr. 2025;3(2):483-511. doi: 10.51594/gjabr.v3i2.93.

27. Dhaliwal D, Shenoy J, Williams R. Common auditors and relationship-specific investment in supplier-customer relationships. The British Accounting Review. 2025:101732. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101732.

28. Heij CV, Volberda HW, Van den Bosch FA, Hollen RM. How to leverage the impact of R&D on product innovation? The moderating effect of management innovation. R&D Management. 2020;50(2):277-94. doi: 10.1111/radm.12396.

29. Dao TC, Liao YK, Chen G, Luu TMN, Le TM. The Influence of B2B Social Media Marketing and Relationship Marketing on Customer Relationship Management Effectiveness, WOM and Loyalty: A Mediator Analysis. International Review of Management and Marketing. 2025;15(1):71-81. doi: 10.32479/irmm.17340.

30. Wahyudi T. Penerapan Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Bagi UMKM. Jibma. 2024;2(2):175-85. doi: 10.65255/jibma.v2i2.43.

31. Haryanto R, Zai YYM, Nampira AA, Yuliana A, Desembrianita E. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Analysis in Customer Retention. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2025;6(6):5173-82. doi: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.5461.

32. Shah Tahmasebi E, Mazarei S, Lalazar F. Market Orientation and New Product Performance: Investigating the Moderating Role of Managers' Social Relationships and Customer Tacit Needs. Modern Marketing Research Journal. 2019;9(4):97-114.

33. Guo S, Li Y, Hu Y, Xue F, Chen B, Chen ZM. Embodied energy in service industry in global cities: A study of six Asian cities. Land Use Policy. 2019:104264. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104264.

34. Babaahmadi Tangeh Gazi M, Karrrahi Moghaddam S. Identifying and Presenting a Model of Barriers to the Implementation of an Electronic Insurance Services System (Case Study: Ahvaz Health Insurance). Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Medicine. 2020;63(2):2455-69.

35. Alshurideh M. Does electronic customer relationship management (E-CRM) affect service quality at private hospitals in Jordan? Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2022;10(2):325-32. doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2022.1.006.

36. Aria FT, Dafoulas G. Introducing a Conceptual Model for Electronic Customer Relationship Management Readiness in the Banking Sector. International Journal of Business and Technology Management. 2023;5(2):127-36.

37. Kaur H. ECRM Practices adopted by Selected Public & Private Banks in Punjab. Finance India. 2023;37(1).

38. Rezaghipour Y, Hashemi SA, Ranjbar M, Gholtash A. Presenting a Desirable Model for Electronic Citizen Education with Regard to the Philosophical Foundations of Citizenship Education. 2021:153-66.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-10

Submitted

2024-07-15

Revised

2024-10-08

Accepted

2024-10-15

How to Cite

Javan Javidan, S., Marjani, A. B., Hajalian, F. ., & Moradi, M. . (2024). Designing a Smart Communication and Electronic Service Management Model with Citizens Based on the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) Approach. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 2(6), 1-16. https://journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/103

Similar Articles

21-30 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.