The Impact of Economic Uncertainty Shocks and Liquidity and Credit Risks on the Sovereign Spread Index in Iran, Considering the Shadow Economy Index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61838/jmbs.470Keywords:
Sovereign spread, economic policy uncertainty, liquidity risk, credit risk, shadow economy, IranAbstract
The present study aimed to examine the effects of economic uncertainty shocks and liquidity and credit risks on the sovereign spread index in the Iranian economy, while taking into account the shadow economy index. In terms of purpose, this research is applied, and in terms of nature, it is descriptive–analytical and classified as an ex post facto study. The statistical population consisted of Iran’s macroeconomic data over the period 1986–2024, extracted from the World Bank database and domestic sources. To construct the composite Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, fluctuations in monetary, fiscal, and exchange-rate variables were extracted using the Hodrick–Prescott filter and subsequently combined through principal component analysis (PCA). In addition, the size of the shadow economy (Shr) was estimated using Tanzi’s currency-demand approach. A structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model was employed to analyze the dynamic relationships among the variables and estimate the empirical model. The results of the unit root tests (Phillips–Perron) and cointegration tests (Johansen–Juselius and Engle–Granger) indicated that the variables were stationary at the first-difference level and that long-run equilibrium relationships existed among them. The findings obtained from the SVAR estimation showed that shocks to economic uncertainty, credit risk, liquidity risk, inflation, the debt ratio, and the shadow economy index had positive and statistically significant effects on Iran’s sovereign spread index. Furthermore, the impulse response function (IRF) results indicated that the effects of shocks gradually dissipated toward zero in the long run, while the variance decomposition results showed that economic uncertainty and the shadow economy index accounted for the largest shares of fluctuations in the sovereign spread index. Based on these findings, controlling macroeconomic instability, improving fiscal and monetary discipline, and containing the informal sector of the economy are among the most important policy recommendations for reducing sovereign financing cost differentials.
Downloads
References
1. Panetta F. The Global Economy: Navigating Uncertainty and Change. Banca d'Italia, 2025.
2. Goodhead R. The Economic Impact of Yield Curve Compression: Evidence from Euro Area Forward Guidance and Unconventional Monetary Policy. European Economic Review. 2024;164:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104716.
3. Hubert P, Blot C, Bozou C, Creel J. Same Actions, Different Effects: The Conditionality of Monetary Policy Instruments. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2024:103596. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103596.
4. Mahmoudifard A, Hosseini Aliabad SMR, editors. Monetary Policies in the Era of Digital Transformation and Systemic Shocks: From Traditional Channels to Unconventional Instruments and Emerging Challenges. First National Conference on New Findings in Management Sciences, Accounting, Economics, Trade, and the Iranian Stock Exchange; 2025; Tehran, Iran.
5. Alinejad M, Koushki Z, Askari F, editors. The Effect of Monetary Policies and Credit Risk on Financial Investment in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Eighth National Conference on Interdisciplinary Research in Management and Humanities; 2023; Tehran, Iran.
6. Eyni A, Akbari Moghadam B, Balounezhad Nouri R, editors. Examining the Effect of Inflation and Exchange Rate Volatility on Non-Performing Bank Loans by Private and Public Sectors Using a Markov-Switching GARCH Model. 13th International Conference on Management, Accounting, Banking, and Economics of Iran; 2025; Mashhad, Iran.
7. Komani B, editor The Impact of Corporate Governance on Credit Risk and Capital Adequacy in Iranian Private Banks. Sixth International Conference on Political Science, Management, Economics, and Accounting; 2025; Hamedan, Iran.
8. Hazrati M, Razmjouei M, editors. The Role of Credit Risk in the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance. 21st International Conference on Modern Research in Management, Economics, Accounting, and Banking; 2025.
9. Amiri Z, Rostami Mal Khalifeh M. Evaluating the Impact of Institutional Quality and Corporate Governance on the Efficiency of Iranian Banks: A Combined Analysis of Institutional Indicators and DEA Efficiency. Strategic Studies in Financial and Insurance Management. 2025;2(4).
10. Ghanbari Dahlan Z, Mahmoudi M, editors. The Impact of Corporate Governance and Firm-Specific Characteristics Including Risk and Growth Opportunities on Dividend Policy of Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Fourth International Conference on New Challenges and Solutions in Industrial Engineering, Management, and Accounting; 2025; Damghan, Iran.
11. O'Sullivan C, Papavassiliou VG, Wafula RW, Boubaker S. New Insights into Liquidity Resiliency. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2024;90:101892. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101892.
12. Ferreira S. Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation Policies. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 2024;16. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-095314.
13. Han Y, Jia H, Xu C, Bockarjova M, van Westen C, Lombardo L. Unveiling Spatial Inequalities: Exploring County-Level Disaster Damages and Social Vulnerability on Public Disaster Assistance in Contiguous US. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;351:119690. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119690.
14. Hao J, Sun R, An J, Jiao A. Natural Disaster and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from Earthquakes. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2024;96:103610. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103610.
15. Horváth R, Kalistová A, Lyócsa Š, Miškufová M, Moravcová M. Do Hurricanes Cause Storm on the Stock Market? The Case of US Energy Companies. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;97:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103816.
16. Yao Y, Yang B, Zhou Y. Natural Disaster Experiences and Household Entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;102:104080. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104080.
17. Naifar N. Spillover among Sovereign Credit Risk and the Role of Climate Uncertainty. Finance Research Letters. 2024;61:104935. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104935.
18. Liu Z, He S, Men W, Sun H. Impact of Climate Risk on Financial Stability: Cross-Country Evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2024;92:103096. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103096.
19. Mandel A, Battiston S, Monasterolo I. Mapping Global Financial Risks under Climate Change. Nature Climate Change. 2025:1-6. doi: 10.1038/s41558-025-02244-x.
20. Kedward K, Gabor D, Ryan-Collins J. Carrots with(out) Sticks: Credit Policy and the Limits of Green Central Banking. Review of International Political Economy. 2024:1-25. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2024.2351838.
21. Mertzanis C. Central Bank Policies and Green Bond Issuance on a Global Scale. Energy Economics. 2024;133:107541. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107541.
22. Nourmohammadi S. The Relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Investment Efficiency with Emphasis on Business Strategy. Strategic Studies in Financial and Insurance Management. 2025;2(4).
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahsa Ghasemi Farid (Author); Reza Rahimi; Khashayar Seyedshokri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
