An Organizational Ecology Approach to the Tourism Industry: A Generalist–Specialist Perspective
Keywords:
Organizational Ecology, Tourism Industry, Generalists, Specialists, Hotel Management, Niche Strategy, Environmental Fit, TehranAbstract
This study aimed to analyze the tourism industry through an organizational ecology approach by identifying the characteristics, environmental conditions, competitive dynamics, and strategic implications of generalist and specialist orientations among four- and five-star hotels in Tehran, Iran. This qualitative study was conducted among managers of four- and five-star hotels in Tehran, Iran. Participants were selected using purposive sampling based on their managerial experience, familiarity with hotel operations, and knowledge of competitive and environmental conditions in the tourism industry. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 hotel managers, and recruitment continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The interviews addressed service diversity, target markets, competitive positioning, resource dependence, environmental uncertainty, organizational flexibility, specialization, and adaptation strategies. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the constant comparative method. Coding and analysis were conducted iteratively through continuous comparison within and across interviews, development of conceptual categories, examination of contrasting cases, and refinement of relationships among niche breadth, organizational strategy, and environmental conditions. The analysis indicated that generalist and specialist orientations represented two distinct but dynamic ecological responses to market and environmental conditions. Generalist hotels were inferred to possess greater resilience under heterogeneous and unstable demand because diversified customer groups and service portfolios reduced dependence on individual market segments. However, this advantage was accompanied by greater managerial complexity and resource coordination requirements. Specialist hotels demonstrated stronger differentiation, clearer organizational identity, focused resource allocation, and closer alignment with specific customer needs, but their narrower niche increased vulnerability to segment-specific disruptions. The findings further indicated that the relative effectiveness of either orientation depended on environmental uncertainty, competitive intensity, resource availability, technological capability, stakeholder relationships, and destination characteristics. The generalist–specialist distinction provides a useful organizational ecology framework for understanding strategic positioning in the hotel industry, suggesting that organizational success depends less on adopting a universally superior strategy than on achieving an appropriate fit between niche breadth and environmental conditions.
Downloads
References
1. Lin Y. Spatio-temporal pattern and driving factors of tourism ecological security in Fujian Province. Ecological Indicators. 2023;157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111255.
2. Liu H. Study on the Complex Relationship of Tourism-Economy-Ecological Environment in Arid Zones: The Case of Xinjiang, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2024;12. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1435660.
3. Shen W, Chen Y, Rong P, Cao W, Yu R, Wang P, et al. Ecotourism Suitability at County Scale in China: Spatial Pattern, Obstacle Factors, and Driving Factors. Ecological Indicators. 2025;178:113911. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113911.
4. Mu XQ, Guo XY, Ming QZ, Hu C. Dynamic evolution characteristics and driving factors of tourism ecological security in the Yellow River Basin. Acta Geographica Sinica. 2022;77:714-35.
5. Sergeyeva AM, Abdullina AG, Albekova AY, Shumakova GZ. Development of children's and youth tourism in the modern social space of Kazakhstan. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. 2022;31(1):142-51. doi: 10.15421/112214.
6. Hosseini SS. An Elaboration of Obstacles and Perspectives of Medical Tourism Development Taking the Approach of Integrated Service Provision (Case Study: Isfahan Province, Iran). South of Russia Ecology Development. 2023;18(3):210-25. doi: 10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-210-225.
7. Peng X, Feng M. Study on the Path of Integration Between Agriculture and Tourism Industry in the Context of Ecological Revitalization: Taking Tongshan County as an Example. 2022. doi: 10.3233/atde220358.
8. Alves SVL. The Use of Technologies for a More Sustainable Community-Based Ecotourism – An Experience on an Ecological Trail in the Brazilian Amazon. Observatorio De La Economía Latinoamericana. 2024;22(2):e3348. doi: 10.55905/oelv22n2-168.
9. Sidqi M, Bengen DG, Priyanta M, Anggraini E, Sadiyah L. Sustainable Management of Marine Ecotourism in the Gili Matra Marine Conservation Area: An Economic Valuation and Stakeholder-Based Approach. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 2026;95:104804. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2026.104804.
10. Sobhani P, Esmaeilzadeh H, Sadeghi SMM, Wolf ID. Land Potential for Ecotourism Development and Assessing Landscape Ecology in Areas on Protection of Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024;26(3):8103-37. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-02978-8.
11. Hadifar S, Amanollahi J, Emamgholi L, Zamani N. Investigating the Threats of Sustainable Ecotourism by Integrating the Norms with GIS and Remotely Sensed Data. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2026;90:127198. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127198.
12. Chen G, Yao Q, Yu Z, Zhang J, Zhu J. The Effect of Shared Ecological Value on Buyer-Supplier Relationship within Mountaineering Tourism. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):23464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73944-1.
13. Sentanu IGEPS, Zamrudi Z, Praharjo A, Haryono BS, Badjie G. Examining the Crisis Leadership of Public-Private Partnership in Ecological Based Tourism of Bromo Tengger Semeru. Journal of Local Government Issues. 2024;7(2):210-23. doi: 10.22219/logos.v7i2.32321.
14. Da Silva AE, Maracajá KFB. Exploring Sustainability in Ecotourism: Advancing the SDGs Through Socio-Ecological Resilience, Co-Management and Co-Production. Advancing the SDGs in Developing and Emerging Economies. Cham: Springer; 2025. p. 167-80.
15. Tampubolon LRRU, Marwiyah S, Haryati E. Integrating CBT and SWOT Models for Marine Ecotourism Management in Tlocor Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences. 2025;11(1):2494713. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2025.2494713.
16. Zada M, Khan S, Zada S, Dhar D, Marcao R. Harnessing Social Media and NGO Collaboration for Advancing Sustainable Ecotourism Policy: A Pathway to Sustainable Tourism Development. Sustainable Development. 2025. doi: 10.1002/sd.3373.
17. Tombeg BA, Soemarno S, Leksono AS, Aziz U. Establishing City Branding Strategy for Tomohon Central Tourism Area in Indonesia in Attracting Interest in Visiting Tourists. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology. 2024;23(3):20-9. doi: 10.9734/ajee/2024/v23i3531.
18. Zeng Y, Zhong L, Li Y. Identifying Key Areas of Managing Landscape Use Conflicts among Ecotourism Stakeholders in National Parks. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2026;265:105515. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105515.
19. Trendafilova S, Ziakas V. Advancing Sustainable Sport Event Management and Sport Ecology: The Missing Links. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. 2025:1-16. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2025.2459732.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arvin Roozitalab

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.